The Tostado Take: Biology Gets the Final Vote by Dr. Julia Tostado

The Tostado Take: Biology Gets the Final Vote 

Navigating AI in orthodontics—where technology helps and where human judgment still leads


by Dr. Julia Tostado


Artificial intelligence has officially entered the orthodontic office. Depending on who you ask, that’s either exciting, terrifying, overdue, overhyped, or all four at once.

For years, orthodontists worried about direct-to-consumer aligners, corporate consolidation, insurance pressures, and social media dentistry. Now, a new conversation dominates study clubs, conferences, and resident discussions: Will AI make orthodontists more efficient, or slowly make them irrelevant?

One thing seems clear: AI isn’t coming. It’s already here. The more useful question is, what role orthodontists will choose to play as the technology evolves.

The great fear: Will AI replace us?
Every major technological shift in dentistry triggers the same anxiety. Digital radiography was supposed to replace diagnostic skill. Intraoral scanners were supposed to eliminate craftsmanship. Aligners were supposedly going to make braces obsolete. None of that happened, and AI appears to be following the same trajectory.

Most orthodontists don’t fear artificial intelligence itself. They fear commoditization: a future where treatment planning becomes automated, human expertise becomes undervalued, and orthodontics gets reduced to clicking “approve” on computer-generated setups.

AI platforms are already capable of landmark identification, cephalometric tracing, treatment simulations, aligner staging suggestions, and predictive analytics. The efficiency gains are real, but many orthodontists point out the obvious limitation: Teeth aren’t pixels. Human biology rarely follows software timelines.

AI performs best when cases stay within ideal parameters: mild crowding, good compliance, healthy periodontal support, predictable growth patterns. Real-life orthodontics is messier. Patients forget elastics. Others disappear for six months and return wanting perfection in three weeks before a wedding. No algorithm currently replaces the clinical intuition developed through years of treating humans instead of digital avatars.

AI is already quietly running the office
AI is already embedded in daily practice, often without much fanfare. Scheduling software predicts cancellations. Imaging systems automate diagnosis. Virtual monitoring systems assess aligner fit remotely. Chatbots answer routine questions after hours. In many offices, AI functions less like a robot orthodontist and more like an invisible staff member who never sleeps.

The biggest near-term impact of AI may not be replacing doctors; it may be reducing the repetitive administrative burdens that contribute to burnout. That efficiency can create more face-to-face time with patients, not less. Ironically, the more technology enters orthodontics, the more valuable authentic human interaction may become.

Patients still want a human doctor
Patients appreciate efficiency, but they still crave reassurance, trust, and personalization. Parents want someone to explain why expansion is necessary. Nervous teenagers want encouragement before bonding appointments. Patients experiencing setbacks want empathy, not automated notifications. AI can deliver information. It can’t deliver confidence.

Meanwhile, expectation inflation is becoming a real challenge. Smile simulation tools let patients upload selfies and receive instant visual predictions. Social media filters further distort perceptions of what natural smiles should look like. One orthodontist described a patient who arrived carrying printed screenshots from an AI simulation app, confidently explaining what their treatment should look like. After examination, the clinician realized the proposed movements would create significant periodontal and occlusal problems. The software generated an attractive image. It didn’t understand biology.

Patients may increasingly arrive armed with AI-generated expectations, which means orthodontists will need stronger communication skills than ever. Digital setups represent goals, not guarantees. Biology always has the final vote.

AI and the finishing problem
Finishing remains one of the great humbling experiences in modern orthodontics. Digital treatment plans often look perfect on screen. Reality is less cooperative. Tiny rotational discrepancies, incomplete torque expression, marginal ridge mismatches, and occlusal interferences can linger despite otherwise excellent treatment progress.

AI has improved staging, tracking prediction, and aligner efficiency, and yet the final millimeter still challenges even experienced clinicians. Future AI systems will likely improve this dramatically, but finishing currently remains one of the most operator-dependent aspects of orthodontics. Technology helps. Experience still matters.

The humor of AI in orthodontics
Orthodontists have always used humor to cope with stress, unpredictability, and difficult patient management. AI has simply created new material.

There are jokes about patients wearing aligners only before appointments because the virtual monitoring app sends reminders, and stories about AI-generated progress reports describing “excellent compliance” moments before discovering untouched elastic packets still sealed in factory packaging. Some clinicians joke that future AI systems may eventually predict every possible treatment complication except the exact moment a teenager decides to stop wearing trays before prom photos.

Others observe that after spending thousands on cutting-edge software, the biggest determinant of treatment success still comes down to whether the patient actually follows instructions. Technology evolves rapidly. Human behavior evolves slowly.

Ethical concerns are real
Important concerns remain. Orthodontic AI systems often rely on massive datasets including radiographs, photographs, scans, and treatment records, and practices must ensure compliance with privacy regulations. Bias is another concern; AI systems trained on limited datasets may produce less reliable predictions across diverse populations.

There’s also the question of overreliance. If software always recommends extraction patterns, staging, or attachment placement, does independent critical thinking slowly weaken over time? Technology should supplement education, not replace it.

So, tool or threat?
The answer depends less on the technology than on how orthodontists choose to engage with it. AI will almost certainly reshape orthodontics, improving efficiency, enhancing diagnostics, and likely increasing access to care. But orthodontics isn’t simply moving teeth. It’s understanding biology, facial aesthetics, psychology, growth, function, compliance, communication, and trust.

The orthodontists most likely to thrive will be the clinicians who understand both technology and humanity, who use AI confidently while staying clear-eyed about its limits. Patients remember how clinicians made them feel. They remember honesty during setbacks, reassurance when treatment needed refinements, and empathy when braces broke before school pictures. No algorithm replaces that.

Artificial intelligence may transform orthodontics. Human intelligence still defines it. So, where do you believe the line should be drawn between automation and human clinical judgment?

Author Bio
Julia Tostado Dr. Julia Tostado earned her DDS from Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León and completed her Master of Science in orthodontics at Centro de Estudios Superiores de Ortodoncia. She currently practices at the family-owned clinic, Tostado Ortodoncia, and shares insights with the orthodontic community through her contributions on Orthotown’s social media.

Sponsors
The Orthotown Team, Farran Media Support
Phone: +1-480-445-9710
Email: support@orthotown.com
©2026 Orthotown, a division of Farran Media • All Rights Reserved
9633 S. 48th Street Suite 200 • Phoenix, AZ 85044 • Phone:+1-480-598-0001 • Fax:+1-480-598-3450