
In literature, “point of view” is a great determiner
of many aspects of a good book. It can establish
all of the necessary elements that can push it to
the top of the bestseller list. In orthodontics, “field
of view” is a determining factor and a valuable tool
for an orthodontic practice. The 3D cone beam CT
(CBCT) view helps me in diagnosis and treatment
planning, and dramatically improves patient education.
The full field of view provides complete and
concise information in less time than conventional
2D methods.
Prior to investing in CBCT technology, my radiographic
protocol was time consuming, inefficient
and inaccurate. First, we took cephalometric and
panoramic X-ray images at the initial diagnostic record
exam. Then, a mid-treatment panoramic X-ray was
obtained at an appointment that I call the “panoramic
reset appointment.” From this, I evaluated root parallelism
and other factors to determine if I needed to
reposition brackets. At the final records exam, we
would take a cephalometric X-ray and another
panoramic X-ray. For “observation” patients, we needed
an initial cephalometric and panoramic and annual follow-
up panoramic radiographs; then, at the start of
treatment, we would take a cephalometric and a
panoramic radiograph and continue with the usual
radiographic protocol until treatment completion.
With my CBCT system, instead of “the many,” I’m
down to “the one.” Every patient gets an initial full volume
3D scan, and if I need to get a progress panoramic
X-ray at the panoramic reset appointment, I am most
grateful that my cone beam system has the ability to
take a 2D standard panoramic radiograph as well.
A full-field-of-view CBCT scan is invaluable.
While CBCT units with a small field of view are currently
available, it’s my opinion that for an orthodontic
practice the large field of view provides greater
benefits. Consider this: A view of craniofacial anatomical
landmarks is needed for efficient orthodontic case
planning, and the information obtained from complete
facial structures and anatomical relationships is
imperative for all types of orthodontic treatment,
including facial reconstructive and orthognathic surgeries.
With my full-field-of-view scanner, in about
nine seconds I have the benefit of true orthogonal
images, panoramic, lateral cephalometric, frontal
cephalometric, paranasal sinuses, TMJ and airway
views. With all of that data, even if I want to review a
patient’s TMJ status two years later, I have the great
benefit of having the initial full-volume scan. While I
may not have considered the necessity of tomograms
on that patient’s joints during the initial visit, now I
have every conceivable view readily available. Just by
virtue of telling my software exactly what it is I am
looking for in the data cloud, I can reconstruct any
view at any time. With the full-volume scans I obtain,
I can even create 3D digital models.
CBCT scans truly facilitate patient education,
which translates to more starts. If my younger patients
have difficulty in understanding a particular problem or
obstacle that I need to overcome for their orthodontic
treatment, I can show them their 3D skeletal structure
and the way their primary teeth are related to their permanent
dentition, giving them a clearer picture of what
I am attempting to diagnose and treat. With this
tremendous educational tool, my younger patients and their parents understand what I am trying to do, why I
am doing it, and why we need to start at a certain time.

So that parents do not worry about radiation exposure,
I have effective dose comparison data that shows
that my in-office CBCT emits 10 times less radiation
than a medical CT scan of the same area. I explain to
them as necessary, that the full field of view scan of their
child gives me much more information than a traditional
2D X-ray. I feel comfortable and justified in my
decision to use a CBCT scanner as my primary radiographic
instrument.
Assistance and education are available to boost confidence
in reading these scans responsibly. Since I was a
surgeon before embracing orthodontics, I am very
comfortable evaluating a CT scan. If I find an anomaly,
I have a protocol in place for sending it out to an oral maxillofacial
radiologist. For a simple e-mail and $75,
he assesses the full-volume DICOM data and sends me
a 2-page printed report. I follow up with a specialist, as
necessary. Certainly not every scan needs a radiologists’
review. Learning about reading a CBCT scan can be
compared to dental students looking at their first
panoramic X-ray. Now, as educated orthodontists, we
would chuckle if someone asked if we should send a
pan out to a radiologist. That same concept applies to
CBCT technology.
The cone beam’s clarity and detailed 3D images
offer an element of reliability to diagnosis. For example,
a few years ago a California jury determined that
CBCT could have avoided a misplaced dental implant
and subsequent facial pain. Dr. Donald Machen, a recognized
authority on risk management in the orthodontic
office (who is also a board certified orthodontist,
physician, lawyer and a trial court judge) agrees
that the learning curve for new technology can be successfully
navigated. He says, “Accepting that each practitioner
has dedicated their professional life to
providing high quality treatment to patients, each will
develop the skills needed to evaluate the technology
used in their practice.” He adds, “Suspicious pathology
should be promptly disclosed to the patient, and a
diagnosis, treatment plan or informed consent given,
or if the practitioner prefers, referral to another practitioner”
or specialist in the field.
Education offers us new insight. Dr. Machen further
advises, “Practitioners are well advised to receive
some additional education and training on evaluation
and interpretation, just as for any new technology
that they intend to use.” Opportunities abound for
learning – Webinars, seminars, symposiums and
Congresses, such as those offered by the 3D Imaging
Institute, provide instruction on a wide array of topics.
Clinicians can learn how to fully take advantage
of cone beam data, recognize deviations in anatomy,
and how to integrate 3D scans with other 3D imaging
and planning applications.
Cone beam technology is evolving into the standard
of care in the orthodontic practice. This field of
view has affected my point of view on imaging. The
scans have helped me to achieve some novel orthodontic
results and have had such a positive impact on my
practice that I couldn’t imagine practicing without it.
|
Dr. John Graham, DDS, MD lectures worldwide to both doctors and orthodontic staff on the most advanced orthodontic treatment
philosophies available. He received his Bachelor of Science degree from Brigham Young University, a dental degree from Baylor
College of Dentistry in Dallas, Texas, and then a medical degree from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School.
After medical school, Dr. Graham completed an internship in general surgery at Parkland Memorial Hospital followed by training
in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Following his surgical training, Dr. Graham received his certificate in orthodontics from the University of
Rochester/Eastman Dental Center in Rochester, New York. He is a featured speaker at the 4th international Congress on 3D Dental Imaging
in La Jolla, California. |