By John W. Graham, DDS, MD
The very essence of the difference between standard medical
CT scans and cone beam CT scans is that CBCTs are acquired
with one, low-energy, cone-shaped beam delivered via an isocentric
revolution around the patient's head (similar to a panoramic
radiograph) – with reconstruction of the acquired data via complex
algorithms. Medical CT scans reconstruct multiple slices of
patient anatomy acquired with high-energy, multi-rotational
fan-shaped beams. The clear advantage of CBCT technology is
decreased radiation to the patient. The details of CBCT capture
and acquisition are beyond the scope of this brief article, but
excellent articles exist on the subject.¹
The advantages of CBCT data on all patients in a private
practice cannot be fully appreciated this early in the technology's
development. That being said, some of the potential benefits are
worth addressing.
Likely, the greatest of all possible benefits of CBCT datasets
is the myriad of radiographic studies that are available to the clinician
with one simple scan. Nearly any conceivable skeletal
view is at the doctor's fingertips from the day of the scan into
perpetuity. Think about that value alone. Gone are the days of
wishing you'd taken tomograms or forgetting to take a frontal.
You have a view of everything! One scan, with about the same
gamma radiation as a high resolution panoramic X-ray solves all
these problems.
The potential applications don't stop there; think of the
clarity of instruction when a parent or patient can easily visualize
the severity of impactions, crowding, or asymmetries as the
3D skull is rotated, sliced, highlighted and magnified.
Communication with specialists and referral sources becomes
clearer, more precise and more powerful.
The evolution of DICOM interpretation software is quickly
moving orthodontists to the exciting and profitable reality of
single-scan-based appliance fabrication and "impressionless" initial
and final study models.
Protocol-based evaluation of radiographs is the de facto
method that ensures thorough and quick assessment of patient
records. The inherent advantage of utilizing a systematic protocol
on each patient is that repeatability fosters reliability. It is up
to each individual clinician to develop and modify their own
radiographic evaluation protocol (something that hopefully is
already in place for the evaluation of 2D X-rays) to suit their
practice needs. What is provided below is only one example and
certainly is not meant to imply that it is the only protocol, or the
best protocol, to evaluate cone beam radiographs.
- Start global: Begin with the full-volume 3D rendering
of the skull and teeth. Slowly revolve the skull starting by
viewing the patient's right side and rotating around the
front and completing on the left side. The benefit of
starting with the full-skull rendering and observing from
"30,000 feet" is that subtle abnormalities such as
mandibular asymmetries, maxillary cants (often observed
initially as uneven piriform apertures) and the like may
become more obvious than if initially viewed as "slices."
- Coronal slices: Starting from the anterior and moving
distally scroll through coronal slices looking for abnormalities
such as impacted or supernumerary teeth;
observing bone thickness in edentulous areas; noting
generally sinus symmetry; and presence or absence of
sinus wall thickening. Sinus tissues that appear unusually
thick are an indication of possible chronic sinus disease, possibly affecting breathing and jaw development. A
coronal view provides visualization of the medial and
lateral poles of the TMJ, as well as general torque of
posterior teeth.
- Saggital slices: Start from the right side and scroll
through to the left side. Sagittal views allow for visualization
of anterior tooth torque, as well as a second scan
for abnormalities such as impactions, dilacerations and
the like.
- Axial slices: Starting from the top of the head and
scrolling down, observe general symmetry of sinuses,
tooth roots, TMJs and other structures. The axial view is
excellent for the visualization of cortical bone adjacent
to tooth roots both on the lingual and buccal surfaces.
The axial views allow for a third scan for abnormalities.
- TMJ view: Utilizing the TMJ views in the DICOM software,
observe both joints for obvious abnormalities such
as beaking or flattening. Compare the sizes of both sides
assuring symmetry. Ensure that the condyles are seated in
the fossae evenly on both condyles, and that the cortical
bone of each condyle is even and uninterrupted.
To reiterate, this is only one protocol and can be easily
modified or added to. Many software programs allow for multiple
view windows on one screen. Thus a practitioner may
have the 3D volumetric representation of the skull, with three
additional windows opened on the same screen representing
the coronal, saggital and axial views.
However it may be done in an individual's office, remember
that the key is repetition, and that repeatability fosters reliability.
The entire evaluation of a patient's CBCT records
utilizing a protocol such as this, need not take more than just
a few minutes, and is generally done prior to entering the consultation
room. Any noted abnormalities may be referred to an
oral maxillofacial radiologist for further evaluation and formal
interpretation, and multiple services exist which provide simple
and secure internet-based transfer of DICOM data for this
very purpose. This provides the examining clinician with the
peace of mind that a formal radiological exam has been provided
and documented in the patient's records. While not necessary
on all patients, it is a nice adjunctive service to have at
the orthodontist's fingertips.²
CBCT technology is here to stay, and as a profession, we
should be most grateful. Gone are the days of poor and inaccurate
radiographic diagnosis. We have the opportunity now as
orthodontists to safely provide our patients with the best and
most advanced diagnostic techniques available, and in doing
so, provide them with the best treatment possible.
* The above Protocol is offered to show what the authors are using in
their practices. As with all new technologies, as more experience is
obtained, the protocol may change without further notice. Before adopting
any approach, each practitioner should carefully evaluate the protocol
for examining and interpreting CBCT image datasets. In addition, each
clinician is encouraged to obtain additional education and training in all
areas relevant to this important area so as to offer ethically and legally
competent care for their patients.
References:
- German, D.S., German J.: Cone beam volumetric imaging: a two minute drill, J. Clin.
Orthod. 44: 253-265, 2010.
- www.beamreaders.com
|
John W. Graham, DDS, MD, graduated from Baylor
College of Dentistry then received a medical degree from
University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. He
completed an internship in general surgery at Parkland
Memorial Hospital followed by training in oral and maxillofacial
surgery. Graham received his orthodontic certificate
from University of Rochester/Eastman Dental Center, New
York. He is on faculty at the University of the Pacific, Arthur A.
Dugoni School of Dentistry. He maintains a private practice and
lectures nationally and internationally on modern orthodontic techniques.
Graham is one of a handful of professionals who have
training in dentistry, medicine, oral surgery and orthodontics. |