KZ, a 38-year-old male, presented with a narrow upper
arch, Class I, lower crowding, and an upper midline off to
the right due to missing his upper right lateral incisor, cuspid
and first bicuspid. He lost these teeth approximately 25
years previously in an automobile accident and has been
wearing a "flipper" to fill this space. He was interested in
orthodontic treatment in order to idealize his upper and
lower arches for implants and restorative dental work to
replace the missing teeth. He was not interested in addressing
his retrognathic maxilla, surgically or otherwise. This
patient is a policeman and intensely refused fixed appliances,
insisting that we use Invisalign. Back in 2003, early in the
understanding of the scope of treatment with aligners,
designing a correction with aligners spanning such a large
space was a challenge (Figs. 1-10).
Our treatment goals were to expand the upper arch, align
the midlines, correct the crowding in the lower arch, and idealize
the space created by the missing teeth for implants. In addition
to coordinating the upper and lower arches, expansion of
the upper arch was intended to optimize the skeletal base for
bone augmentation in preparation for the implants. We accomplished
the expansion with a removable, hyrax-type expander,
which the patient wore six months
and activated one turn per day. To
better satisfy the patient, pontics were
fabricated into this appliance to
replace the missing teeth (Fig. 22).

Following the arch expansion,
Invisalign aligners were delivered
with "virtual" pontics for the upper right lateral incisor, cuspid, and first bicuspid (the missing teeth). These empty pontic
spaces were filled with a tooth colored pontic material provided
by Align Technology (Fig. 11). Unfortunately, the initial aligners
did not adequately obturate the superior space between the
gingival aspect of the aligners and the boney defect in the area
of the missing teeth. This condition allowed air leakage which
seriously affected the patient's speech and satisfaction. After the
first two aligners, mid-course correction aligners were ordered
with the buccal and palatal edges of the aligners extended in
the area of the missing teeth so that the pontic-filling material
could be added sufficiently to completely fill the space and prevent
any air leakage. Although this required a large amount of
pontic-filling material for each and every aligner, this solution
was aesthetic and satisfied the patient's needs throughout the
course of the 15 MCC aligners and the additional four refinement
aligners.
In a little less than one year, the patient was ready to have
bone implanted in the area of the missing teeth to augment the
boney support for the three new implants (Figs. 12-21). Due to
the alveolar expansion of the upper arch and the boney augmentation,
the placement of the implants was able to be optimized
and the resulting crowns were constructed without compromise
(Figs. 23-28).
This is an interesting case for a number of reasons:
- The orthodontic treatment made a notable contribution to
the complete restorative needs of this patient.
- The design of the expansion appliance included plastic
pontics for the missing teeth.
- In a "pre-TAD" era, how would this long span of missing
teeth have been stabilized so the orthodontic movement
could have been accomplished?
- The patient's demands for treatment without braces were
satisfied with Invisalign and he was able to continue his
law enforcement occupation.
- The filled virtual pontics for the missing teeth provided
an
acceptable aesthetic solution during the term of the
active treatment.
|