
by Orhan C. Tuncay, DMD, FCPP
Educator shortage is the single most major threat to the
future of orthodontics as a specialty. Monetary compensation is
the major problem, but there are those few who would not mind,
or even embrace, the "call" to become an educator scholar despite
the meager earnings. But they can't. Even if they concede to meager
earnings, they will still drown in their educational debt.
Becoming an educator is simply not an affordable option for the
majority of graduates who could become interested in a career in
education. Instead, they choose to feed their families. In the end,
they might spend a life in regret that they could have been an
academic, a somebody – making a difference, advancing the
field. Perhaps, becoming an excellent golf player is a form of coping
mechanism, as it certainly could occupy one's mind enough
to take away the sting of academic disappointment and channel
it to disappointment on the green.
Who then is the guilty party for the accumulated mountain
of debt? The oft-reported high figure is around $450,000. The
new graduate will be paying – for a very long time – approximately
$3,000 every month on his debt. After this installment,
chances are, the academic paycheck will not put bread on the
table and pay the rent in the same month. Whose fault is it?
Are the residents who try to get an education to pursue happiness
the guilty party? Or are the universities who charge high
tuition to be blamed? Obviously, if the universities did not
charge astronomical figures for tuition, the student would not
need to borrow that much. Then, why must the universities
charge what they do? Well, it is not cheap to run a university.
Every time the cost of heating oil goes up by a dollar, it becomes
a significant burden for the university to heat all the classrooms,
gyms, offices and the like. Universities must maintain a sizeable
police force that they did not have only a few decades ago. Then
there is the cost of living increases for faculty and staff.
Insurance policies of all sorts, and many, many expenses, overwhelm
the finances of the university. As high as it is, the tuition
money covers only a small portion of the residents' training
costs. It is an ever-so-expanding feedback loop. By and large,
foreign universities don't do tuition; only some miniscule-scale
fees. But we do. It is the difference between government sponsorship
and non-profit private enterprise models. It is indeed
complicated. It might not be solvable within the foreseeable
future, at least, by the means available to us.
How do we attract new recruits to academia in the midst of
such colossal financial restraints? Universities are cash-strapped;
especially, the state-owned ones. Just about every state has cut
their allocations, in some states by as much as 50 percent. This
is a major blow. Universities are now in a survival mode. We
cannot expect a major rise in the salaries earmarked for orthodontic
faculty positions any time soon. Fortunately, benefits have stayed the same so far, and they are significant: health care
for the family, tuition remission for kids, malpractice, disability,
insurances are covered, one-month vacation time in addition to
time off for travel to professional meetings, sick leave, personal
leave, job security in lifetime employment for tenured faculty,
discounts from vendors (mostly electronic devices such as
mobile phones, computers, etc.) for being a faculty member, all
in addition to retirement benefits, post-retirement long-term
health care, and the like. These fringe benefits can be costly in
private practice; especially, in the earlier years. If the doctor is
not in the office, the cash register does not register. Thus, for the
business owner professional meetings, payments for insurance,
post retirement expenses, and many other necessary expenses are
cash layouts where they are all covered, and are pre-tax at the university. Perhaps, the biggest difference between academia and
owning a business is lifestyle.
Certain personalities are more suitable for an academic
career and others for owning a business. In an institutional environment
there is always someone above, who makes decisions
that profoundly affect the life of the faculty member. Whereas,
in practice the business owner is the one who affects the lives of
others, or his/her own. In this landscape of two different
employment schemes, it is reasonable to think there are still a
good number of personalities (younger, talented, skilled, more
enthused, and better educated) who would want to be academic.
But where is the money to pay for the educational loans?
This portrayal above reveals one interesting fact: universities
had to tax the students to such an extreme extent, and now, they
cannot recruit them to become educators. This is cutting off
your nose to spite your face. Unfortunately, if they are to stay in
business, they must collect enough tuition to stay in business.
This is the ever-so-expanding feedback loop. In our current economic
climate, in a manner of speaking, universities must eliminate
their supply lines to stay alive until the reinforcements or
rescuers arrive. But will they arrive?
The answer to this question is a depressing one: there might
never be bailout money for education – certainly, not for the
orthodontic educator. For the past 50 years, education was the
constant victim of great robberies. Budgets have decreased while
the expenses increased. Every government of every U.S. president
chose to cut back spending on education. It is a very sad
track record for the greatest nation on earth. It we were to look
at reduction of funding in education as an attack, then we must
develop systems and protocols for defense.
The American Association of Orthodontists has been proactive
to establish AAOF fellowships to young faculty. Given
the size of educational debt a graduating resident is burdened
with, however, the fellowship money does not go far. Here is a
proposal for a system of debt burden relief:
Educational loan debt monthly payments are made by a foundation
or departmental discretionary funds. Payments will be
made as long as the faculty member stays on the job. If s/he
wishes to move to a different university or practice, then the
payments stop. The funds can come from a variety of sources:
increased clinical income, alumni donations, donations from
corporations, donations from non-alumni friends, planned giving,
and many other sources.
Endowments dedicated to this cause are more meaningful
and better return on the investment when compared to
endowed professorships. It is important, however, to protect the
funds and their earmarked status. Institutions are known to be
much too eager to get their hands on any discretionary funds
under the university umbrella.
In the grand scheme of things the amount of money paid out
for the educational loans of faculty members does not demand
big donations from the alumni. For example, if a graduate program
has about 200 alumni/ae, each will have to contribute
about $36 per month.
One does not have to be an intellectual celebrity to realize
our specialty is under attack and invasion. But it is not limited to
orthodontics. In medicine, the otolaryngologist, plastic surgeon,
dermatologist, they all do everything. The distinction between
the specialties has disappeared. Even spinal surgery may be performed
both by neurosurgeons or orthopedic surgeons. This
invasion of property in the medical model, however, is limited to
specialty areas. Consequences of an invasive attack by the general
practitioners will be equally devastating to the specialties in medicine
and dentistry. Orthodontics has always been at the
crosshairs of general practitioners. And recently, the crosshair
scope, the weapon and ammunition have gotten easier to use.
Fortunately, the orthodontist is still the better marksman because
of the educators who have educated him/her.
We, the orthodontists, need to maintain the educational system
to stay as the better and special soldiers. The imaging technology
has made appliance construction easier, less dependent on
manual dexterity; hence, the fuzzy distinction between the
orthodontist and the general practitioner. If the general practitioner
and orthodontist are armed by the same high-quality
weapons (scanners, robots, materials, and software) the excellence
of marksmanship will be determined by the level and quality
of training and education.
The kind of educational establishment needed is the one that
will advance the field away from the rest of the fields of dentistry
where orthodontists are equipped with very special knowledge
and skills. Advancements are not left only to the manufacturers.
Instead, the advances created in the academic settings will pull the
specialty away so far that no other dentist can catch up. These
advances may be made in imaging technology and biotechnology.
It should behoove everyone to preserve the educational leg of
orthodontics. The cost is not much, but the departments must
offer payments on the educational loans of newly recruited faculty.
It is a matter of self-preservation. We cannot turn to the
government or to the universities. It is in our will and power to
make the specialty of orthodontics stay special, or to lose it.
I ask all our readers to make it happen.
|