Meet Zack, a typical teenager visiting my orthodontic office. His maxillary second molar,
tooth #15, was not erupting as seen radiographically over time. Previous 2D progress
panoramic X-rays were unremarkable other than showing #15 not making eruptive progress
(Fig. 1). Our recent 3D scan captured by my i-CAT, showed that some action was going on,
literally behind the scenes. After cross-sectioning the scan axially and sagitally (Figs. 2 & 3),
the parents, patient and I saw that a third molar, undetectable on a 2D pan, was interfering
with eruption. This finding by a 3D scan did not surprise me. Since I implemented CBCT
imaging, I have found six other teens with similar circumstances in the last year and a half.
While some people say, “seeing is believing,” that is not always the case with 2D imaging. In
fact, without a 3D scan, my treatment plan would have been completely different.
Most likely, I would have waited six to 12 months to evaluate eruption of this tooth. If
or when no progress was seen, I would have conjectured that the tooth might be ankylosed. I
might have sent Zack to the oral surgeon to luxate the tooth. Depending on the surgeon’s
approach to luxate or mobilize this tooth, he still might have missed the palatal third molar
that was interfering with eruption. Following mobilization, we would have again waited six to
12 months and checked progress with a 2D radiograph. If progress continued to be lacking or
not occurring, we would then have entertained surgical exposure and bonding with a button
and chain or extraction. In Zack’s case, I could very well have followed the wrong treatment
approach because of the lack of correct information.
Even though we do our best to make orthodontics fun, visiting the orthodontist is not
always the highlight in a teenager’s day. Getting the best and most correct information out of
our imaging is paramount. This allows to us to choose the most appropriate treatment plan.
Optimal treatment planning not only gives us the best treatment results, but often translates
into shorter treatment times and the least discomfort. Three-dimensional imaging helps orthodontists
to make the right decisions during this time of life when deciduous teeth and permanent
teeth often share the mouth. The extremely beneficial feature of having 3D in
orthodontics is that I no longer have to guess at a tooth’s position based on a “flat” two-dimensional
panoramic image. At an exam, records or progress imaging appointment, I can now see
the exact tooth position, its path of eruption and proximity to adjacent roots. I am getting more and more referrals from dentists and pediatric dentists to
evaluate the positions of unerupted teeth. It helps them treatment
plan extractions, treatment timing and referrals.
Before implementing cone beam 3D about 18 months ago,
I had researched this imaging modality and had been waiting for
an orthodontist-friendly 3D machine and especially for software
that was very user-friendly to a busy orthodontic practice. i-CAT
fit this profile. There are many scanning profiles available, but I
primarily use two different types of scans: the 8.9-second scan
and the 4.8-second scan. With the flexibility to change resolution
and radiation exposure, I know that 3D scans at my office are in
an acceptable range as compared to taking a panoramic X-ray (or
a full-mouth series) and a ceph. The important aspect of CBCT
imaging is that with the 3D scan available, I can very vividly and
accurately show patients and parents teeth on a computer screen.
Patients trust that I am choosing the right course of treatment
because they can actually see the anatomy as I do, in three dimensions
from all angles.
There are other anatomical situations where 3D easily reveals
something and 2D is completely “blind.” I have had quite a few
cases now where there is a supernumerary tooth in the palate or
out of the focal trough of the radiograph that does not show up
in conventional 2D imaging. A more common use for our i-CAT
is accurately locating the position of ectopic canines that have to be surgically exposed and
bonded to assist eruption. While my oral surgeon colleagues are skilled clinicians, they sometimes
have to guess whether a palatal approach versus a labial approach is best. Knowing exactly
where the crown of a cuspid is relative to the adjacent roots and alveolar ridge eliminates the
guesswork. This shortens the surgical procedure and results in less trauma to the tissues. As a
result, the patients get better post-operative healing with less pain and discomfort.
|
A native Oregonian, Dr. Jeff Sessions graduated fourth in his dental
class from Oregon Health Science University in 1985, then proceeded to
Indiana University in Indianapolis, Indiana. He has been in private practice
in Lake Oswego since 1987. Dr. Sessions is an active member in
the American Association of Orthodontists, the Pacific Coast Society of
Orthodontists, the Oregon Society of Orthodontists, the American Dental
Association and the Clackamas County Dental Society. Positioning himself
and his practice on the forefront of technology is a high priority. |