by Donald E. Machen, DMD, MSD, MD, JD, MBA, CFA and Hollie A. Machen, Esq.
More than 50 percent of professional negligence (malpractice)
lawsuits are initiated because of poor interpersonal interactions
between the treating health-care provider (or staff ) and the
patient or parent. That is a staggering number and completely
preventable. It is understandable that people might be dissatisfied
with one or more aspects of their interactions with any healthcare
provider or their office staff. This is especially true when
considered in the context of orthodontic care because of the
extended treatment duration when compared with other healthcare
services. It is not uncommon for patients and parents to be
seen for two to seven or more years depending on what age treatment
is initiated and how long retention, etc. is prescribed.
However, it is one thing for a patient to have a complaint
about you or your office; it is another thing for that complaint to
become negative patient criticism to other potential patients/parents
and then quite another for a professional negligence lawsuit to
be filed. With this in mind, it is of utmost importance for orthodontists
to make every effort to resolve any conflict or complaint
before it escalates to this point.
The potential financial loss from both negative patient/parent
comments and lawsuits is enormous. It has been estimated in the
past, long before social media and the extensive online networks
people have developed, that one dissatisfied patient will let 20
other people know of his or her displeasure. Today, you can make
your own estimates, however, it is suggested that in our current
economic environment, an orthodontic practice would likely not
weather a concerted effort by a few unhappy patients or parents.
Here is a simple plan that orthodontists should implement
in their practices so as to have the best opportunity to eliminate
negative patient comments and prevent any lawsuits.
First, it is essential that each office have a written grievance
process that provides an opportunity for a patient or parent to
discuss the problem and offer the practice or practitioner an
opportunity to remedy the situation. This one protocol will, by
itself, all but eliminate the complaint from spiraling out of control
and leading to a malpractice claim. Less than one percent of
the offices surveyed utilize this process. However, when
patient/parent surveys were conducted, it was the most frequently
mentioned deficiency. Specifically, patients/parents
expressed their frustration with several aspects of the orthodontist/
staff/patient/parent interaction, including two key aspects:
a lack of communication and a rigid and inflexible manner of
interaction rather than a warm and personal atmosphere when
a question arose.
Why do complaints occur? In a perfect orthodontic patient
visit, at the appointed time, the patient is greeted warmly by a
knowledgeable and friendly orthodontic assistant and escorted
into the appropriate treatment area. The orthodontist greets the
patient and parent (if a parent is present) and listens quietly to
anything that either has to say before examining the patient. The
orthodontist asks appropriate questions, if needed, and performs
the clinical exam and advises the assistant as to needed treatment
for this visit. Also, the orthodontist asks, “is there anything else
I have not covered or that you would like to tell me?” Each office
is a little different, however, the idea is the same – to convey an
empathic and focused attention on providing the highest quality
care, in a warm and professional manner.
However, let’s be realistic; things don’t always go as we would
like. Although most visits to the orthodontic office are just fine,
some aren’t. A perfect example is one that led to the initiation of
a lawsuit several years ago. It went like this:
The patient and parent arrive for an after-school visit. The
reception area is crowded with other patients and parents. The
patient is called back for treatment and the mother accompanies
the patient to speak with the assistant and requests to speak with
the orthodontist about her concerns, specifically that treatment
is not progressing as she thinks it should be. The orthodontist
is summoned to the reception desk and before mother has a
chance to voice her concerns, the orthodontist states that he
doesn’t have time to speak with her about this or any issues
because he is too busy during the after-school rush. She will
need to make a separate appointment. What the orthodontist
did not know was that the mother had taken a half-day off from
work and traveled 30 miles just to express her concerns, ask for
some explanation and learn what the plan was going forward.
A scene ensued with some raised voices and less-than-ideal
behavior on the part of both the parent and the orthodontist.
The patient and parent left. A few days later, a request for
records to be transferred to another orthodontist was received
and subsequently, a lawsuit for malpractice was filed. (Note: if
the orthodontist didn’t have time for the mini conference with
the parent, how will he find the 200-300 hours required for
preparation and trial of the lawsuit? In addition, the mental distress
to him, the staff and his family is even more devastating.)
While orthodontic staff and practices are generally efficient
and compassionate, the process sometimes gets hijacked. A
patient walks away with a negative reaction that will either pass
with time or lead to repercussions. However, it is important to remember that patient complaints and grievances occur even
when you conduct a near-perfect visit.
Here the patient and parent left without their concerns even
expressed. Frustration was understandable. Put yourself in this
parent’s mindset, especially when it deals with your child and
where you took time off of work and traveled a distance for the
purposes stated. There was no good ending to the scenario as it
occurred. However, it was all avoidable, including all the negative
comments made to others about their poor treatment, and what
the others in the reception room heard and saw.
The orthodontic practice that adopts a clear policy for permitting
people to express their complaints, concerns and frustrations
provides an outlet that prevents the escalation of a negative
outcome. This process does not have to be elaborate or lengthy.
The key is to let everyone know that you have this complaint
resolution mechanism in place; that includes staff, patients, parents,
referring dentists, etc. It is useless if no one knows that it
exists. Discuss it at the consultation visit and place it in the
office policy manual.
Make sure the complaining patient/parent knows that you,
the orthodontist, will see the complaint and discuss it with the
staff and respond to it promptly. It doesn’t matter what the complaint
concerns. Every complaint should be important to you,
no matter what the basis.
Our office uses the following process to get started:
- We have an office policy.
- We educated our staff members on the policy and the process.
- We developed a complaint form that we made readily available
to patients (Fig. 1).
- We include all complaints or dissatisfaction, oral and written.
- We review and evaluate each situation.
- We identify corrective actions.
- We resolve the situation and we always give the patient/
parent or complaining person the opportunity at the time
of complaint to express their concerns, even if we were
busy. That old saying, “Fast is slow… and slow is fast”
seems very appropriate.
Also, remember that even with an effective complaint-resolution
protocol, the goal is complaint avoidance. Make sure there is
ongoing staff and orthodontist training and review. Carefully analyze
any situation that occurs to learn from it and avoid a recurrence
of the same or similar conduct.
Among other reasons, the following common reasons for
patient dissatisfaction are: 1. lack of communication; 2. excessive
wait time; 3. unresolved billing issues; and, 4. rudeness. With the
above in mind, we decided that initially calling something a complaint
(form) set the wrong tone. So, we call the form: I Need to
Speak with You About…
Our office protocol is stated below:
As part of our consultation, orientation and office policy
review, patients and parents are conditioned to know that it is
very important to Dr. Machen that all of their concerns, questions
and complaints related to care or services provided in his
office are handled promptly, professionally and consistently.
Further, they are told that if our initial informal efforts do not
adequately solve your concerns, it is Dr. Machen’s policy to do
his best to make reasonable efforts to do so.
Our goals are simple. We want to provide a protocol
whereby patients/parents can voice concerns and where all
involved can discuss an acceptable resolution. If additional time
is needed to review a complaint, a mutually convenient time is
set aside for either a follow-up visit or telephone call. However,
before any discussion about a future resolution occurs, it is very
important at the first encounter that the patient/parent has had
the time he or she needed to fully present concerns. It is imperative
that the complainant not feel that he or she has been
cut-off, shut down or prevented from having the opportunity to
completely air the grievance.
At the outside margin, there might be times where the practice
has taken what they consider to be reasonable efforts under
the circumstances to resolve complaints, but the patient/parent
are still dissatisfied. Hopefully, these are not frequent. However,
even in these situations, if the patient/parent has been treated
courteously, professionally and been given all the time needed to
express their concerns, it is far more likely that they will have a different
view toward the office than the patient and parent in the previous example. It will be unlikely that either negative comments
to the extent mentioned or a lawsuit would be filed.
With the implementation of the protocol, which is part of
an overall Encounter-Based Risk Management (EBRM) system,
more fully described in our book entitled Risk Management in
Orthodontic Practice, this potentially catastrophic initiator for
negative patient comments and/or malpractice lawsuits will have
been eliminated.
|