by Dr. Salvador Romero
Introduction
A 34-year-old patient (Fig. 1) wanted to close the spaces
between the front teeth and put an implant on the first upper
bicuspid (Fig. 2). He didn't want the braces to show so he
came to the office for lingual braces.
Diagnosis
The patient presented a challenging combination of circumstances,
dental spaces, absence of the first upper bicuspid
and overbite (Fig. 2).
Treatment
Lingual customized brackets and wires for upper and lower
arch. In the order of the customized brackets we chose from
cuspid to cuspid vertical slot .018 and from first bicuspids to
second molars horizontal slot .018. We placed the turbo bite
on the upper cuspids to help the overbite. Contact only existed
on the front part where the bites were located so we had the
opportunity of opening the bite since the beginning.
On the setup we planned to keep the space for the implant
on the first upper bicuspid (Fig. 3).
Continuing with the adjustments we found that it was
impossible to move the second upper bicuspid (Fig.4). We
placed two TADs, one of them applying direct pressure to the second upper bicuspid which had no positive results. We even
tried making a little bit of luxation for movement, obtaining
no results at all. On the other TAD we made a vertical movement
on the upper right cuspid, applying a lever movement
on the root (Fig. 4).
Making a close diagnosis on the right upper bicuspid area,
we found a problem of hypercementosis on the second bicuspid.
This forced us to make changes to the original treatment
plan of placing an implant and taking a closer view. We had to
work with the periodontics, prosthodontics and endodontics.
Considering the mentioned outcomes, the decision of performing
the root canal and building a flying bridge that would hold
on to the second right upper bicuspid with the hypercementosis
and leave a little extension to the cuspid, was taken (Fig. 5).
Discussion
We have seen a lot of articles about hypercementosis, and
what we should emphasize is that there is an excessive formation
of cement on the root surface and there is no way of
knowing the exact amount of cement that will be formed,
since even on devitalized teeth the cement keeps growing. This
problem might also damage one or multiple teeth. The three
factors are:
- Physiological: dental eruption
- Phatological: missing next tooth, gingival problems or
periodontitis
- General: Paget problem, acromegaly or giantism
We can take advantage of a hypercementosis tooth as an
anchorage unit for building a bridge. In this case, with the
limitation of not having a space for the implant because the
problem was mesial to the second bicuspid root.
Due to the complications of the patient, we had to make
a good lateral and protrusive adjustment so we would have stability,
and suggested to the patient to use an Essix Ace .040 as
an upper retainer and fix retainers from lateral to lateral on
upper and from cuspid to cuspid on bottom.
Clinical Case #2
Introduction
A 17-year-old patient (Fig. 6) wanted to close the spaces
between the front teeth (Fig. 7). He didn't want the braces to
show so he came to the office for lingual braces.
Diagnosis
The patient presented a challenging combination of circumstances:
dental spaces, lower crowding and overbite. The
main problem we saw on the panoramic X-ray was the presence
of an odontoma between the upper right lateral and cuspid.
It can be diagnosed in adolescence; it is asymptomatic, and
usually found by X-rays. We observed disorganized dental tissue
and it's well delimitated by a radiolucent area (Fig. 7).
Treatment
Lingual customized brackets and wires for upper arch
and labial clear brackets for lower arch. On the order of the customized brackets we choose from cuspid to cuspid vertical
slot .018 and from first bicuspids to second molars horizontal
slot .018, having the turbo bite on the upper cuspids to help
on the overbite and having only contact on the front teeth
where the bites are located, so we have the opportunity of
opening the bite.
From the start we planned to put lower braces combined
with an Essix .040 with two turbos made with the plier and filled with acrylic, that way we can start the treatment and just
wait for the upper braces to come (Fig. 8).
When the upper braces arrived it was very easy for the
patient to make the transition from the Essix .040 with turbos
to the customized lingual braces with turbos on cuspids (Fig. 9).
Discussion
On this clinical case we had a big disadvantage because the
patient didn't help us on doing the enucleation of the pathology.
One of the biggest problems was that the odontoma on
this case started putting pressure on the roots of the lateral
and cuspid.
We had to make good lateral and protrusive adjustments so
we could have stability and suggested to the patient just to use
an Essix Ace .040 as an upper retainer and fixed retainers from
lateral to lateral on upper and from cuspid to cuspid on the bottom
(Fig. 10).
Final Conclusions
On some occasions when we have pathology, there are disadvantages
for orthodontic treatment; we have to explain to the
patient that in some cases we can find a positive way to take
advantage of the situation.
|