I have been fortunate to watch the development of cone beam computed
tomography (CBCT) imaging over the years. When I was doing dental research in
2001 using the first FDA-approved CBCT system, we had to wait overnight for our
volumes to be reconstructed. Now, we have the opportunity to capture and reconstruct
3D images in a matter of seconds.
Even since 2001, practitioners have been sensitive to the ALARA (as low as reasonably
achievable) principle and cognitive of the radiation exposure to our
patients. When a patient is in my chair, I always think, "If this was my child, what
decision would I make regarding the diagnostic records that I need to treatment
plan this case?" The answer is that each clinician needs to determine the benefits
based on treatment philosophy and patient needs.
As a speaker, and in informal settings with colleagues, I
am often asked about radiation dose versus diagnostic information
obtained in 2D versus 3D imaging. When taking
ALARA into consideration, the i-CAT FLX, which was
recently released by Imaging Sciences International, has made
it easier to make the decision to implement a 3D system. Now,
a 2D panoramic and lateral ceph can result in a larger radiation
dose than taking a scan with an i-CAT FLX using the
QuickScan+ setting. You can, for the most part, capture from
Menton to Orbitale using the largest QuickScan+ FOV for
around 11 microsieverts of radiation*, compared to a pano-ceph
combination of, on average, 30 microsieverts - a substantial
radiation savings. At this point, the argument of whether you
can justify a 3D scan is flipped on its head. Now, the question is,
with all of the information obtained with a CBCT, how can I
justify not taking a 3D scan using the low-dose QuickScan+ setting
versus exposing patients to higher radiation from a traditional
pano-ceph?
As orthodontists, we don't need the same spatial resolution
as endodontists or oral surgeons. We are trying to localize teeth,
evaluate the overall craniofacial morphology, identity eruption
paths, and ectopic teeth. We don't need to see the trabeculation
of the bone, so we are able to sacrifice some of that spatial resolution
for a lower dose. And by doing so, we get the diagnostic
information we need, and it still looks great reconstructed
in the volume renderings.
Misdiagnoses and treatment plans that may go awry can
often be prevented with the more robust diagnostic records
provided by CBCT. There is a saying, "Your treatment plan is
only as good as your diagnosis." Improving your diagnostic
power by using CBCT results in improved treatment plans,
and ultimately, better treatment results.
It is an exciting time to be an orthodontist. I think it is fantastic
that i-CAT is taking the lead in low-dose 3D imaging
research and development. However, the real winners are the
patients and the doctors.
*data on file with Imaging Sciences
|