As an introduction to the topic, a definition of strategy seems necessary.
Although disagreement exists as to a definition for strategy, the authors suggest the
following as a working definition: the art of distributing and applying the means
to fulfill the ends of a stated policy. In orthodontic practice, this presumes that a
policy has been articulated.
In hundreds of consulting engagements over the past 25-plus years, it is a rare
orthodontic office that has a stated “policy” before we begin to work together. To put
this in perspective, it might be helpful to give several examples of generic strategies.
Most of us are familiar with the low-cost strategy often described as no-frills. At the
opposite end, we have a luxury or high-end strategy that attempts to maximize the
customer experience. There is also a focused strategy wherein a limited array of
services or service area is offered in an effort to own that market.
From this, the reader can see how having a strategy enables the business to obtain
a segment of the market or a market share. By way of a further example, imagine
there are three orthodontists in town. Each one has approximately one-third of
the market. One day, a new orthodontist decides to open an office. Over the next
several years, each of the now four orthodontists will likely have a quarter of the market.
This is true, for the most part, if none of the three original orthodontists
obtained a sustainable competitive advantage (SCA). An SCA occurs by developing
and implementing a durable strategy. Specifically, it is a strategy that takes planning,
time and resources to develop. In other words, it is a strategy that is not easily copied.
Merely obtaining a competitive advantage isn’t enough since simple strategies
such as the ones mentioned previously are easily copied, at least in the short run. Also,
some strategies might not be as attractive as others. Not everyone wants to be the lowcost
provider, especially in orthodontics. Similarly, attempting to be the luxury orthodontic
provider long term might prove to be a very difficult strategy, especially in the
wrong locale or economy. Also, it might be difficult to convince the marketplace of
the merit of providing only one type of treatment, no matter what the problem.
In our example of the three orthodontists, if one orthodontist had developed
an SCA in the first place, he or she would likely have had more than a third of the
market share. It is likely that half or more of the market would have been his. When
the new orthodontist moved into town, the likely scenario would have been that
the two remaining original orthodontists and the new orthodontist would have
been dividing the remaining 50 percent. By having an SCA, new entrants who have
done their due diligence would be less likely to move in, but in any event, one or
more of the non-SCA practices would likely not be able to remain viable and probably
need to move. Today’s competitive landscape is such that one of the few edges
that an orthodontic practice has today is the creation of a strategy that established
an SCA.
During the most recent five-year period, when the economy has been less than
optimal, many orthodontists have reported declining practice census numbers.
Some practices have no growth or limited growth. However, a small percentage of
practices have reported increasing growth. Of this later group, there are several practices
that have special circumstances, (e.g. they are the only orthodontist in their
area). More often, however, these special few practices that are growing are doing so
because they have developed an SCA.
Every savvy businessman strives to
gain an SCA. An SCA allows market
share gains with far less expenditure of
valuable resources, especially in difficult
economic times. In good economic
times, the practice with an SCA will
experience a magnified benefit over those
who lack this important intangible asset.
Ultimately, when a business or practice is sold, the value attributed is far greater and
characterizes the final benefit that is received by taking the time to implement the
systems needed to create the SCA.
While it is true that a short-term increase in new patient visits can probably be
achieved by aggressive internal and external marketing, the cost is high and the results
will not last. The results from implementing an SCA strategy aren’t necessarily immediate.
This is because it does take some time to reorganize and create the proper office
structure along with implementing the necessary procedures and protocols. However,
it doesn’t take long to see the difference in all aspects of the practice from increased
referrals, improved current patient satisfaction, reduced stress, elimination of negative
comments, complaints and confrontations and improved communication.
However, it is important to begin the process needed to obtain an SCA as soon
as possible since if you don’t, your competition might do so. Once the competition
has done so, you can still obtain an SCA but it might involve more of the resources
described previously.
Less than five percent of orthodontists surveyed have a strategy or strategic plan.
Less than half of those practices express confidence in maintaining their current
market share, let alone expanding, if either the economy should remain flat or if
another orthodontist would enter the practice market. This, by itself, can be a major
source of stress for the orthodontist. Also, without a strategy and implementation
plan and periodic re-evaluation, the orthodontist could feel as though his ship has
no rudder and might experience burn-out professionally and personally.
Our solution to these issues and our suggested method for obtaining an SCA
can be accomplished with a three-part strategy. The first step is to understand where you and your practice are on the continuum of all orthodontic practices in your
area. As part of this endeavor, benchmark your practice against the best of the best
practices anywhere. This includes procedures and protocols, especially communication,
and your organization. Each aspect must be carefully evaluated. You must be
objective and see your practice as others see it. Specifically, how are you viewed by
patients, parents, referring dentists, physicians, etc.? Be exhaustive. It is a humbling
and sobering experience, but one that will yield much valuable information.
Next, determine what the most highly successful practices are doing. In large measure,
the best orthodontic practices are doing three basic things that lead to developing
a sustainable competitive advantage. They are communicating better. Their interpersonal
relationships are better, and, their organizational architecture is superior.
Great internal and external marketing and advertising programs might bring
patients to your office. Once the patients arrive, a three-component SCA program
which includes optimal communication protocols, the appropriate organizational
architecture and optimal interpersonal relationships will significantly increase the
probability that they will start treatment with your office. Once started, it increased
the probability that they will refer others. These new patients and their referrals,
when added to your own satisfied patients and their referrals, are now yours forever.
The difference is the obtaining of the sustainable competitive advantage.
Year after year, orthodontists ask for forms or samples of correspondence, such
as informed consent forms, referrals forms, progress review forms, pre-finishing
checklists, consultation letters and other items. However, the overwhelming majority
of orthodontists do not have a strategy or a strategic plan developed toward
obtaining an SCA. Consider putting the piecemeal approach aside. Devote the time
and effort needed to develop something of enduring value that will pay dividends
for the rest of your practice life and well beyond.
Your orthodontic practice is likely to be your greatest asset. You should care for it
and protect it appropriately while maximizing its value and your overall success.
|