A Case for CBCT Volumes
and Intra-oral Scans
to Replace Plaster and Digital Models
by Alan A. Curtis, DDS, MS, Editorial Director, Orthotown Magazine
|
In 2006, I graduated from my orthodontic residency and
joined my father, an orthodontist of 35 years, in private practice.
At the time we took plaster models before and after all
cases. We sent off the pre-treatment casts to be polished and
soaped. The strange thing was after spending $40 per model,
they were promptly placed in storage
never to be seen again until the debond
final records were taken. At the time of
debond, the models were pulled from storage
and a retention protocol was developed.
During treatment, every attempt
was made not to violate intercanine width
and excessive lower incisor proclination.
As my father’s retirement approached, the
looming question was how do we handle
35 years of orthodontic records stored in
offsite storage.
During my residency, I used OrthoCAD digital models to
digitally compare buccal tipping of bonded vs. banded RPEs for
my master’s thesis. Feeling a need to have a digital record of the
malocclusion, we transitioned to OrthoCAD digital models at
the same time as we transitioned away from print photographs
and film X-rays. A paper treatment chart was replaced by a digital
or electronic medical record. New patient medical histories
were scanned into our Dolphin practice database. Once again,
digital models were sent out and promptly filed electronically
once they arrived. For speed of retrieval, the 3D .stl file was captured
into 2D jpeg standard views of occlusal, frontal and buccal
orientations, and placed into our Dolphin imaging database.
Images were captured 1:1 in order to accurately monitor archform
and intercanine/intermolar widths.
Along comes October 2010 after
the housing collapse of 2008/2009 a
dentist colleague of mine approached
me about buying his first generation
i-CAT. He was forced to close his
doors, being unable to keep his largely
implant-based practice afloat. Justifying
a four-year-old, $75,000 piece of
equipment in the midst of an economic
meltdown was one that kept me up at
night for a week straight. Once I realized
the opportunity cost, the decision
was an easy one to make. At 20-30 starts per month and 15-20
debonds per month, the practice was spending close to $2,000
on digital models! Once we were able to justify accepting a 1:1
direct 3D image of the teeth and jaws as an alternative to a 3D
model on the computer screen, the economic decision to invest
in the future technology was a no brainer!
To offset the cost of the CBCT machine, we also began doing
3D scans for oral surgeons and periodontists. This revenue alone
made the machine cash flow from the very first month. Another factor we did not expect was dramatically improved case acceptance.
Patients were better able to see the difficulties they were facing
and therefore signed up for treatment rather than sitting on
the proverbial fence. The combined effect of decreasing costs
from model creation and storage, to increased revenue from “outside”
scans and increased case acceptance was a synergistic boost
our practice needed at a time when other practices were feeling
the crunch of a down economy.
The upcoming step in taking our practice to the next level
will be to incorporate 3D intra-oral laser scanning into our current
technology mix. Advances in technology from iTero, 3M
and Ormco, to name a few, will make the dream of having a
fully 3D digital office a reality.
The future is here; the future is now. Take the plunge and
enter the world of 3D digital imaging for the health of your
patients and your practice! |