
We all work with the hope that
one day the fruits of our labor
will allow us to retire happy and
financially capable of living the
lifestyle we desire.
When I entered the industry
five years ago, I thought a large
number of currently practicing
orthodontists were approaching retirement age. My
initial thoughts centered on how the industry would
react to having to replace all the soon-to-be-retiring
orthodontists to meet patient demand, and, more
importantly, how quickly it could do so. After talking
to a number of orthodontists, the AAO leadership,
and after having reviewed the AAO’s list of practices
for sale, you can appreciate my surprise when I realized
that only a very small percentage of orthodontists
were even considering transitioning their practice in
the next five years. A deeper dive into exactly what was
driving this desire or need to keep working at an
advanced age (I can say that) was warranted.
As I asked more detailed questions of orthodontists
I met along the way, I unearthed several reasons
they continued to practice well past the typical
retirement age of most medical professionals.
Several answers seemed to be repeated:
- “I love what I’m doing.”
- “The nature of an orthodontic practice and its physical requirements allow me to continue to
practice until my health stops me.”
- “My wife/husband/significant other won’t
allow me to quit.”
But the one consistent theme that came up in
every conversation was simply this: “Financially, it
doesn’t make sense to sell. The economics just don’t
work. If I work two more years, I will make as much
money as I am being offered today and still own the
practice. I can’t retire on the money I’ll make from
selling, so I need to keep working.”
Wow! The American Dream of starting your own
company (practice in this case), working hard
through all the years, getting to a point in time where
you could sell it and make lots of money, retire to the
beach or golf course, all shot down in flames!
Many doctors have asked me what they could
do about this perceived or real injustice. My answer
is to grow your practice quickly and through whatever
means necessary, but first you need to understand
the underlying economics upon which the
value of your practice is based. Secondly, understand
what its fair market value is today, and there
is no better definition of the fair market value of
your practice than this—your practice is worth what
a buyer is willing to pay for it.
For purposes of this article, let’s keep a somewhat
difficult subject simple. Valuation of a practice
is complicated and completed using several different
comparative analyses. OrthoSynetics’ internal
valuation expert utilizes a comparison of capitalized
earning method versus a comparable transaction
analysis. Multiple methods always lead to a range of
values. It is not important to understand these valuation
methods in detail today, only to know these
valuations should be completed by certified business
valuation specialists.
After the amount of pre-pays are determined,
growth versus decline of the practice is identified,
competition plotted, collection percentage and baddebt
ratios reviewed, age and functionality of major
equipment listed, and the probability of a comet hitting
the earth in the next 60 days is agreed to (yes, I
am being a little facetious here, you get my point), a
value is established which on average is (+/-) 76 percent
of trailing twelve month revenue (TTM). The
final value is based on good or bad findings in the
above listed due diligence items, as well as many
underlying factors not listed.
This statement is not intended to 1) limit the need
for a practice valuation when you choose to transition
your practice or 2) suggest that someone other than
those highly professional and competent companies or
individuals that conduct them. It’s just that there’s not
enough room in this article to write about all the items
these experts review to assess value. They are, and will
always be, a key part of the transition process.
Before we put this all to a test, let’s provide some
definition to financial terms I discuss below:
- Annual Gross Revenue: All receipts collected
into a practice for services rendered over a 12-
month period. Often referred to as trailing
twelve month revenue (TTM) when looking
at the most recent 12-month period.
- Annual Net Income: Annual Gross Revenue
minus all operating costs of a practice (staff,
rent, insurance) and prior to paying taxes.
- Profit: The money you take home, the bottom
line, net profit, or net earnings after taxes.
Utilizing the 2013 Journal of Clinical
Orthodontics Orthodontic Practice Study results for
the average practice’s Annual Gross Revenue
($1,160,000) and applying the industry’s average
76 percent selling price, a sale would provide the
seller $881,600 from the transaction. After tax
(let’s just use a 20.6 percent blended tax bracket,
derived from 75 percent of sale price taxed at capital
gains rate of 15 percent and 25 percent at an
ordinary income bracket of 37 percent), the average
orthodontist would receive $699,900 profit
from the sale.
Now refer back to one of the recurring statements
I heard of why orthodontists are not selling:
“If I work two more years I will make as
much money as I am being offered today and still
own the practice.” Let’s look if that statement is
indeed true. The average annual net income for an
orthodontic practice was reported at 41 percent of
annual gross income, or $475,600 ($1,160,000 x
41 percent). Apply an ordinary income tax rate of
37 percent and what is left is profit of $299,628.
Multiply times two years and you get $599,256 –
not too far off from the $699,900 you would
have made via a sale. So it appears correct at first
blush that the assumption of working two years,
or maybe two-and-a-half, yields the same return
as you would receive in a sale. These calculations
all assume practice revenue remains flat and that
you are not holding a note, in full or in part,
which would further negatively impact or delay
your sale revenue.
So, should a choice be made to sell, the average
orthodontist would receive a check at the sale closing
in the amount of $699,900. And I’m just going
to make a general statement here, but most of us
can’t retire on $699,900 in the bank and expect to
live a similar lifestyle to that we have been accustomed
to. Hopefully, we have all saved and invested
throughout our career and have enough money to
continue to live in the manner we enjoyed preretirement;
the practice sale proceeds would just be
adding a little extra for some extravagancies along
the way. But this doesn’t seem to be the case, at least
with a number of the orthodontists I have spoken to
who should now be considering a transition.
So, not unexpectedly, I often get the question,
“What do I do to get a higher price for my practice
when I’m ready to sell?” This one is pretty easy in
today’s environment. I would bet you have already
figured out the answer based on the examples
above. Simply drive Annual Gross Revenue as high
as you possibly can before considering a sale. And
while the answer is simple, the ability to do so is not
always easy to accomplish.
Many orthodontists getting to the end of their
careers begin to slow down. Again, according to the
2013 Journal of Clinical Orthodontics Orthodontic
Practice Study, those orthodontists practicing 26
years or more have shown a decline in Annual Gross
Revenue of 18 percent versus gross income generated
in their most productive practice years of 11-
15. The reasons might be health issues, fatigue or a
general sense of complacency, a feeling that you have
already reached the pinnacle of your career and just
don’t need or want to “gear up.” Nevertheless, this
decline is the exact opposite of what needs to happen.
Certainly, there are good reasons to slow down,
but absent those, the last five years of your career
should be focused on growth and lots of it. Why?
Assuming the 76 percent of TTM sales price,
every $100,000 of increased Annual Gross Revenue
provides you an additional $76,000 in sale price.
Every $500,000 adds an additional $380,000. Every
$1,000,000 adds $760,000. So how do you get there?
First, set a goal to grow your practice by 50 percent
over the last five years. That’s approximately 8
percent compounded growth per year. The Journal
of Clinical Orthodontics study indicates the “average”
practice median Annual Gross Income grew at a rate
of 22 percent over the last two years (11 percent per
year average, so it is not out of the question). Let’s
take a look at what this growth in annual gross
income would generate for the practice.
Base Year: $1,160,000
Year 1: $1,252,800
Year 2: $1,353,024
Year 3: $1,461,265
Year 4: $1,578,167
Year 5: $1,704,420
Effectively, we have raised our Annual Gross
Revenue in year five by $544,420 versus the base
year, leading to a $413,759 increase in sale price (76
percent of $544,420).
Now, let’s refer to Figure 1 to look at the impact
in each of these last five years and the additional Net
Income and profit generated to the practice by this
growth. Because much of the overhead and cost is
covered in the gross income of $1,160,000, we will
utilize a 40 percent versus a 59 percent expense/overhead
factor on all additional gross revenue (very conservative
as any additional practice costs are based
mostly on significant marketing initiatives to drive
volume, supplies, small additions to staff and
increases in staff compensation).
The top section of the chart marked “Stagnant”
assumes no growth over a practice’s last five years.
Your profit (take home after taxes) over those five
years is $1,498,140. Your profit on the sale in year
five is $699,900. Total take-home income in the last
five years of practice is $2,198,130.
Fig. 1 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
TOTALS |
Stagnant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Gross Revenue |
1,160,000 |
1,160,000 |
1,160,000 |
1,160,000 |
1,160,000 |
5,800,000 |
Net Income-41% |
475,600 |
475,600 |
475,600 |
475,600 |
475,600 |
2,378,000 |
(37% Tax Basis) |
(175,972) |
(175,972) |
(175,972) |
(175,972) |
(175,972) |
(879,860) |
Take Home after Tax |
299,628 |
299,628 |
299,628 |
299,628 |
299,628 |
1,498,140 |
Sale Price-76% of TTM |
|
|
|
|
|
881,600 |
(20.6% Tax Basis @ 75% CG) |
|
|
|
|
|
(181,610) |
Sale Price Take Home after Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
699,990 |
8% Annual Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
1,252,800 |
1,353,024 |
1,461,265 |
1,578,166 |
1,704,420 |
7,349,675 |
Net Income On Original |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Revenue-41% |
475,600 |
475,600 |
475,600 |
475,600 |
475,600 |
2,378,000 |
Net Income On Increased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue-60% |
55,680 |
115,814 |
180,759 |
250,899 |
326,652 |
929,804 |
Total Net Income |
531,280 |
591,414 |
656,359 |
726,499 |
802,252 |
3,307,804 |
(37% Tax Basis) |
(196,574) |
(218,823) |
(242,853) |
(268,805) |
(296,833) |
(1,223,888) |
Take Home after Tax |
334,706 |
372,591 |
413,506 |
457,694 |
505,418 |
2,083,915 |
Sale Price- 76% of TTM |
|
|
|
|
|
1,295,359 |
(20.6% Tax Basis @ 75% CG) |
|
|
|
|
|
(266,844) |
Sale Price Take Home after Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
1,028,515 |
Summary |
Stagnant Growth for 5 Years |
8% Annual Growth for 5 Years |
Gains |
|
Take Home Over 5 Years |
1,498,140 |
2,083,915 |
585,575 |
|
Net Sale Receipts |
699,990 |
1,028,515 |
328,525 |
|
Income Over 5 Years Inc.
|
2,198,130
|
3,112,430
|
914,100
|
|
The middle section of the chart marked “8 percent
Annual Growth” assumes an 8 percent growth
rate in each of the practice’s last five years. Your profit (take home after taxes) over those five years is
$2,083,915. Your profit on the sale in year five is
$1,028,515. Total take home income the last five
years of practice is $3,112,430.
The bottom section of the chart marked
“Summary” shows the difference in take-home
income over five years ($914,000) assuming an 8
percent year-over-year growth.
So, by planning appropriately when you know
you are five years from transition and spending
some of the additional profits generated by the new
growth to promote more growth, I have shown the
average orthodontist how to add over $900,000
more take-home income in the last five years of
practice. Maybe some of the money could be used
for those little extra extravagancies along the way.
|