Actually, my headline is incomplete. What I really want to ask is
a two-part question,
"What can I do with these old patient records and how long should I keep them?"
This is the question I asked Winn L. Sammons, a malpractice defense specialist
at Sanders
& Parks P.C., a law firm in Phoenix, Arizona. I was familiar with some of
our discussion points, but there were a couple of "items" we talked about that really
set me back a couple of steps.
The answer to the "second" part of the question (how long to keep them?) has
always been, in my understanding, that you must keep records forever. That is why
so many orthodontists have a storage room separate from their offices for all the folders
and plaster from their years of practice. However, Winn explained to me that
today's answer is more related to the statute of limitations as it is written in each
state. For Arizona, when a child reaches the age of majority (18 years old) the statute
of limitations for filing a complaint or lawsuit is two years following majority.
I asked Winn to comment on an example that was presented in a seminar I
attended several years ago. Hypothetically, a 30-year-old sits in a dentist's chair and is
told by the dentist that his teeth need orthodontic treatment. The patient states that
he had orthodontic treatment as a child. When the conversation ends the patient is
given the impression that the previous orthodontic treatment was not successful
(inferring that it may have not been done properly) and it needs to be repeated. The
obvious thought that immediately runs through the patient's mind is the cost of doing
orthodontics again. This thought continues to aggravate the patient until he decides
to contact the state board or an attorney. My questions to Winn were, "Does a new
statute of limitations begin at this ‘time of discovery' some 15 years after treatment
and run for two years going forward? What if the patient is 40 years old and it is 25
years after treatment? Is the orthodontist going to be asked to produce records that
have been in a storage room for all that time – records that might have been discarded
or have degenerated in quality?"
Winn's answer was that it would be in the orthodontist's best interest to have
access to the records for this patient. Several questions that would be addressed in a
situation like this would be answered in the patient's record. Was the treatment concluded
with a result that met the standard of care for orthodontic treatment at the
time? Did the orthodontist record the final result? Did that patient have cooperation
or hygiene issues during treatment that affected the outcome? Was the patient given
instructions about the retention program and how long it should continue? Were
there any comments recorded indicating that the patient was happy or unhappy with
the result or about any other issues? Did the patient have any follow-up appointments
after the retention program started? Was the treatment completed or did circumstances
outside the area of professional judgment influence or affect the
treatment and the result? Did the patient leave the practice on a satisfactory or unsatisfactory
basis and was that documented?
For most of us, these answers might be in the records, but do we have access to
them 15 or 25 years later? Is it mandatory that we keep them that long (or even forever)?
Exactly what do we really have to do? Winn stated that it isn't really an "all or
nothing" requirement when it comes to past patient records. It would be very helpful in the case of a lawsuit or complaint to have them, but there might be some factors
that are related to the excessive time that lapses between the "discovery" and the earlier
finish date of the treatment that could help in defense of an accusation. For example,
did the patient contribute to the problem that is now being discussed years later?
In answering an accusation, even without the patient's records, producing examples
of how cases are customarily finished in your office or testimony of employees
about the procedures and instructions when a patient has completed treatment
would be an asset to a defense. But there is no denying that every piece of a patient's
record is a distinct advantage to defending your position, but all is not lost in case
they just aren't available.
The next item we discussed was the possibility of anything like this happening
15 or 25 years after someone is treated. What's the chance? If it is less likely with
passing years, then when can you draw the line about the need for keeping records
(of course there is the danger of Murphy's Law kicking in. You keep the records for
25 years and the day after you get rid of them you get a certified letter). Winn stated
that, in his experience, the more the records age, the statistics point to a decrease in
the likelihood that you will have to produce them on demand.
Another item that was brought to my attention was the scenario where the orthodontist
and the patient just never connect personally, professionally or emotionally
during the treatment. It is the case where everything started off on the wrong foot,
the treatment did not progress satisfactorily, there were missed appointments, broken
braces, oral hygiene problems and just a general bad time of it all. The degree of
frustration can lead to a very bad decision to just wash your hands of the whole thing
and tell the patient, "Your treatment is finished (when it is not) and we are taking
your braces off." What you don't do is document the termination and disclose that
the treatment is not finished and the reasons that the braces are coming off. You just
want to get this "pain in the clinic" out of your practice forever. The real problem is
that "forever" might not be forever. If this patient is confronted with a crooked tooth
problem in five or 10 or 15 years and, because of some "discussions," decides to file
a complaint, even if your records are accessible and can be reviewed, you are in a serious
jam. The circumstances around the patient's dismissal from the practice could be
construed as "fraudulent concealment." This was a term that I was totally unfamiliar
with. Winn simply explained this means that you are in very serious trouble. Talk
about a field day for the prosecution.
So, we ended our conversation talking about what you should have in your
records, even if they are not as preserved perfectly. Winn stated that "forever" storage
might not be realistic. However, there are key elements of patient records that
can be preserved while all the excess paper could be eliminated. Photographs, X-rays
and treatment cards are certainly core elements of what would be beneficial to any
defense. But he also emphasized that a log of telephone calls, clinic discussions, comments
positive or negative made by patients and/or parents, your comments to
patients and/or parents during an appointment or in a consultation, etc., can be just
as valuable as photos and X-rays when a dispute arises. So a "communication record"
(CR) or a log of any discussions and comments, kept separately from the clinical
treatment card is a very valuable asset. The CR needs to be part of every patient's
orthodontic records and, in and of itself, could provide valuable defense evidence.
I began using a paper form for a communication record in the early 1980s and
today our practice management software has a CR page available in every patient
treatment record. The rule is, when I comment or the patient/parent comments
about treatment or any other issue, a clinical assistant is typing. If I take a phone call
related to a patient, then I am typing. |