
Dr. Orhan Tuncay was the lead investigator on the study that
lead to the Invisalign Teen product. I recently had the opportunity
to visit with Dr. Tuncay to get an overview of this project.
Could you please tell me about the nature of
this study?
Tuncay: For the longest time Invisalign was de-facto reserved
for adult patients, but many of us adventurous clinicians were
treating teenage patients with Invisalign anyway. Ultimately, the
company thought that it could be a good product for the
teenage patient. It is no secret that there are a number of
teenagers who just don’t want braces – they are mostly junior or
senior students in high school. They are the ones who were left
behind because their teeth developed slowly. It is no surprise
when everybody else is getting their braces off, they don’t want
to be seen in braces. Hence, there was a need to address the specialized
need of this non-adult comprehensive treatment patient
population. That is why the product was launched. But in terms
of effectiveness of the product, there was really not much known
other than anecdotal experiences of the clinicians.
Once launched, we thought it would be a good idea to look
at the performance of this teen product in a properly controlled
clinical setting. Furthermore, as the principal investigator of the
study, I did not want a university clinic-based study. I thought
it best the investigation should be conducted in a private-practice
setting.
When did you start this study?
Tuncay: It officially began in January 2008. In this teen
study, selection criteria were such that, when the cases were
finished the patients still had to be teenagers. This meant, at
the start of treatment, the patients had to be 18 years of age
or younger.
How many patients did you have in the study?
Tuncay: We thought that we should have 50 patients in all
and right now we have 60. Also this is a multi-center non-randomized
study. There are four practices: mine, Jay Bowman from
Michigan, Jonathan Nicozisis in New Jersey, and Brian Amy in
Oklahoma. The sample was drawn from our regular patients who
were screened and were offered treatment with the Invisalign Teen
product. Every office gave a nominal discount for the treatment
fee. Also, on a six-month basis, these study patients received a
little gift card. In return, they would agree to show up for the
appointment for data collection intervals (every three months).
How is the Invisalign Teen product different
from the regular Invisalign product?
Tuncay: Invisalign Teen was designed with the input from a
large number of clinicians. Basically, it is the same product (the
same plastic) but it has some special features. I think the most
important element is the compliance indicator. The biggest
problem that any Invisalign practitioner might have is patient
compliance. Thus, the compliance indicators were added. They
are located on the molar tooth. Secondly, as you know, you put
braces on patients and the second molars come in later. Because
of the nature of the Invisalign appliance (it works as an occlusal
plane) we incorporated eruption tabs. In other words, if the second
molars are coming in, there would be a tab covering the
occlusal surface so they would not supra-erupt. Also, Invisalign
Teen lets you prescribe room for erupting cuspids and bicuspids.
So if these teeth are coming in, you could specify in the treatment
how many millimeters you want to allow for growth.
Thirdly, and this is very significant, is the incorporation of the
feature called Power Ridges. These are dimples are near the gingival
margin of the appliance, on the upper incisor teeth. They
push the roots to achieve palatal root torque.
How have the compliance indicators worked?
Tuncay: We’ve published the initial findings of the compliance
indicator part of the study and they are very encouraging because it
showed that compliance indicators work. In other words, color
fades over time. In order for the color to fade, there must be moisture
present, which is saliva, and the environment must be a certain
warm temperature, which is mouth temperature. For example, the
patient can not put the aligner in a cup of water and expect it to
fade. Because the colored compliance indicator is a polyvinyl alcohol
material, which is a food-grade dye, it bleaches continuously
similar to some blue bristle toothbrushes that fade over time. What
we found in the initial set of data, is that the compliance indicator
does fade over time. The interesting finding was there was a difference
of fade rate between the male and the female patient but we
don’t know whether one group has more salivary flow than the
other. So the compliance indicator worked, meaning it faded over
time, but it was not predictable from one patient to the next.
Different people’s indicators faded at different rates. It works as the
patient’s own monitoring device. The patient is his or her own control,
if you will.
So could the parents just take a look at the
aligners and get some idea about how the compliance indicator is fading and how the
patient is wearing the aligners?
Tuncay: Yes, no question. The beauty of the compliance
indicator was instead of policing, the compliance indicator gave
us a chance to monitor the wear.
Teenagers tend to misplace things. What
about lost aligners.
Has that become an issue
in this study?
Tuncay: It has been observed, but only on few patients. Lost
aligners are always a problem. With the Teen product, however,
patients can receive up to three sets of aligners free of charge in
the event of loss.
How have the teenagers
responded to this study and
their parents?
Tuncay: The parents and patients
have been wonderful. But you might
argue that you are looking at a biased
sample, because they are the ones that
agreed to take part in the study. So the
Hawthorne effect cannot be entirely dismissed;
because you are in the study, you
behave better. But let me mention something apart from the
study patient population; in my private practice, there is no
price distinction between braces and Invisalign for the teenage
patient. So, when I ask, “How do you want to be treated? Do
you want me to push your teeth with metal or plastic?” Their
eyes get bigger and they reply, “Oh yes. I want Invisalign.” But
the parent states she/he’s not going to wear them. “Oh no, mom,
I will. I am making a commitment.” Interestingly, once they get
into treatment, because kids are basically making a bet with their
parents, they are remarkably compliant.
Was this surprising to you?
Tuncay: In the beginning it was. Then I started to reflect on
the conversation I had with the child and the mother in the
same room and I realized that the children are more responsible
than their parents give them credit for.
What is the current status of the study today?
Is it over or is it still going on?
Tuncay: We have collected data for 12 months now and the
rest is coming in. So by this time next year we will have collected
just about all of our data for reporting.
So you have about one year left before the end
of the study?
Tuncay: Just about. I don’t think it is going to take a
whole year but we are finishing up the stragglers because not
all patients started at the same time. The study was opened
officially in January 2008, but it took a while for us to collect
all the patients.
In your opinion, has the Teen product filled the
need in your practice for having patients in
treatment who possibly would have not gone
into treatment if braces were the only option?
Tuncay: Yes, indeed. The only difference is, if you are treating
someone with braces and there are deciduous teeth present, you
can still start the treatment. With Invisalign Teen, it works best if
all primary teeth are gone. The start date of the treatment is a little
bit different with the teen product than it is with fixed appliances.
That said, if the permanent tooth has
not yet erupted, the aligner creates a space – like a pontic area, for the tooth to drop into.
What advice would you give
orthodontists who have not yet
started with this appliance?
Tuncay: I can tell you about my own
experience. When I meet with patients and
their parents I help them understand that
teeth don’t know what is pushing them.
Teeth respond to finger pressure, tongue
pressure, rubber band pressure, metal pressure just as they do to
plastic pressure. The treatment is the same, the treatment plan is
the same, treatment time is the same (and, in some instances,
shorter) with Invisalign than braces. I educate them and based
on that there is no competition, except for one thing: some kids
want the different color elastic ties on their braces.
The treatment times on average were about
10-12 months, is that correct?
Tuncay: Ten months, yes, except for one or two cases, but
most of them fall in the 14-18 month range. If we had to do
some torquing or used Class-II elastics it might have taken
longer. The selection criteria were Class-I or Class-II patients;
not Class-IIIs.
What about case refinement or mid-course
corrections. Has that been involved with this
Teen product?
Tuncay: Absolutely! You can do case refinement just as well
as with regular Invisalign. I seem to be on the far end of the case
refinement. I do case refinement probably more than most of
my colleagues.
What final remarks do you have for our readers?
Tuncay: My closing comment would be that everyone
should use Invisalign Teen in their practices because it is a better
product than people think it is. |