

Align Technology recently announced a change in the
Proficiency Requirements that were put in place last year. I had
an opportunity to speak with Tom Prescott, CEO of Align
Technology about this change.
Tom, thanks so much for speaking with me
today. Can you explain why Align originally
started the proficiency requirements? What
was the goal of the program?
Prescott: Last June, Align launched the Invisalign proficiency
program with two objectives: to help ensure every Invisalign
provider can achieve great results for his/her patients, and to
ensure that we can direct any patient to any Invisalign provider
and be confident that they’ll have a great treatment experience.
Many doctors complete an initial Invisalign training course
and then just start a case or two each year – not enough to build
any real confidence with the product and related techniques,
and not enough to stay up to date on the latest product and clinical
advancements.
We believe that hands-on learning gained through regular
product use and continuing education are essential to getting
the best possible results with Invisalign. That’s why we launched
the proficiency program – to help doctors and patients get those
best possible results.
If Align believes strongly in regular product
use and CE, why did you drop the annual
case requirement?
Prescott: It’s simple: we dropped the annual case requirement
in response to our customers’ frustration and unhappiness
with the case requirement.
We knew that the proficiency program was a big change for
our customers, but we did not anticipate the intensity of our
customers’ frustration with the program. Many customers were
really upset by the program – even customers who were meeting
the requirements.
Even though we remain committed to helping ensure great
results for doctors and patients, we are equally committed to listening
to our customers and responding when they tell us there
is a problem.
Is Align dropping the case requirements
because doctors weren’t meeting the requirements?
Were case submissions dropping off?
Prescott: We’re making this change to alleviate the frustration
and concerns of our customers. We’ve been pleased with our
financial results over the last few quarters, and have even seen positive
impact and success among lower volume doctors who
became more engaged with Invisalign over the last few months.
Why drop the case requirement now as
opposed to after the initial launch, when customer/
industry frustration was at its highest?
Prescott: We knew that it would take some time after the
initial launch to fully communicate our goals to customers and
work through this big change in the way we were doing business.
When customers were initially very frustrated with the
program, we thought that giving them additional time to work
toward the requirements would help – so we announced an
additional qualification period. However, customers remained
upset about the program, so we wanted to listen and make the
right changes.
We took the opportunity to announce the change at a time
when we were about to see a lot of customers – at AAO, at some
of Align’s own regional CE events, at CDA, etc.
What role did the AAO and other industry
organizations play in Align’s decision?
Prescott: The AAO has been a good partner to Align
throughout all of this, and has provided very candid feedback to
us regarding AAO member concerns and complaints. We have
really appreciated their leadership and counsel on this, and listened
when the AAO leadership – along with the leadership of
other organizations – recommended that we focus on continuing
education rather than case requirements as a way to encourage
product proficiency.
With that said, numerous other state and national dental
organizations opposed the case requirement – these are groups
with whom we’ve always had good working relationships.
Those relationships are important to us, and we really listened
to their feedback.
Why are doctors still required to complete 10
Invisalign CE hours per year?
Prescott: Invisalign is an evolving product and technique,
and we believe that ongoing training and education
are necessary to stay up to date with the steady stream of and
clinical advancements.
Many organizations, including the AAO and ADA, have recommended
that Align focus on continuing education curriculum,
rather than case requirements, as a means of encouraging
product proficiency.
Completing 10 Invisalign CE hours per year is pretty easy to
do. Align has a robust clinical education curriculum with more
than 200 hours of lecture-based and online learning opportunities
each year, with all online content available 24/7 and at no
cost to customers.
If hands-on learning through regular case use
is important to successful outcomes with
Invisalign, how will Align encourage doctors to
do cases on a regular basis without the annual
case requirement?
Prescott: We believe we can encourage doctors to build their
experience and expertise with Invisalign without the annual case
requirement. For example, we’re going to continue delivering
product innovation and improvements that help doctors achieve
the outcomes expect from Invisalign treatment. We believe that
the stronger the product, the more doctors will want to use
Invisalign for their patients.
We’re also focusing on new and improved customer loyalty
programs that reward doctors who strive for expertise
with Invisalign.
As part of the proficiency program, Align introduced
Invisalign Preferred Provider status for
doctors who met the annual requirements.
What does Preferred Provider status mean now
that the proficiency requirements are gone?
Prescott: Preferred Provider status is still an indication to
consumers of a doctor’s Invisalign experience. Doctors who
reach 10 or more Invisalign case starts a year will get that
Preferred Provider designation, along with valuable marketing
benefits.
While this is not a mandatory requirement, we hope that
our customers will see the value and strive to achieve that status.
What has initial customer response been to
dropping the case requirement?
Prescott: It’s early yet and responses to significant initiatives
are always mixed. With that said, most of the feedback has been
very positive, even from doctors who supported the proficiency
program. Customers want to know that we are listening to
them, and that we’re willing to make changes and adjust programs
as needed to maintain our partnerships with them.
Do you still think that launching the proficiency
requirements last year was the right
thing to do?
Prescott: We still believe in our original objectives and still
believe that regular product use and CE participation are important
to success with Invisalign. But anything that alienates our
customers and causes them considerable stress and frustration
isn’t the right thing to do. We can work towards our original
goals in ways that encourage great results and strengthen our
relationships with our customers at the same time.
Do you have any final comments for our
readers?
Prescott: Thanks, Randy. Going forward, Align will continue
to help doctors and patients get great results by focusing
on clinical education, product innovation and improvement, as
well as our customer loyalty and reward programs.
Tom, I really appreciate this opportunity to discuss
this very important issue with you. To
learn more, please visit www.aligntech.com, or
call 408-470-1000. |