These articles have been authored
by leaders in orthodontics and oral maxillofacial radiology. You
will also find quotes from some of the "experts" in the legal
issues surrounding this technology. We have kept this topic at
the forefront because we believe it is developing into a critical
issue that will change the standard of care in orthodontics.
When this happens, it will affect the professional, ethical and
economic decisions orthodontists make in running their
practices, and the way orthodontics is taught in our resident
programs. At the present time, it is impossible to know when
this change in the standard of care will be formally recognized
by the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO) or state
boards. None of the "experts" who I have interviewed and consulted,
or publications I have read can pinpoint this happening,
but they all agree… it is happening!
I took the liberty to review what we have already published
about CBCT and copied a few excerpts from key articles to
review where we've come from and where we are now.
Of course, as with any technology, the "half-life" is not all
that long and our digital pan/ceph is already being overshadowed
by CBCT scans. So there is no sitting still or being satisfied in this
hyperlinked world in which we practice. But that is really the
exciting thing about orthodontics today. About the time you feel
comfortable – BAM – something new and better comes across
your desk in some magazine. When will it ever stop? Not in my
lifetime, that's for sure – and that's good!
-Dr. Randy Womack, "According to Dr. Wo," November
2008
One of the more recent and exciting developments is the ability
to superimpose two data volumes. This feature could provide
new insights into growth, development, treatment effects and outcomes.
In addition, it stands to conclusively answer some of the
controversies in orthodontics regarding specific treatment claims
and effects.
-Dr. James Mah, "Evolution of Imaging Technologies
in Orthodontics," September 2009
Owning these machines is not like a button-pushing exercise
and out pops a perfect image every time that answers all questions.
These machines have a lot of variables which you can tweak
and play with but you have to know what you're doing right up
front. It's kind of like playing a musical instrument – everybody
can buy one, but not everybody can play one.
-Dr. David Hatcher, "Expert Opinions: CBCT and
Orthodontics," September 2009
You will use this technology or the data from it. It will improve
your practice, make your treatment decisions much easier, be better
for the patient by reducing morbidity associated with some dental
procedures, and will change your view of appropriate dental imaging.
Do not wait. Get trained, get ready and get started!
-Dr. Dale Miles, "Expert Opinions: CBCT and
Orthodontics," September 2009
What I see happening is that more and more orthodontists
are simply going to train themselves. We believe at some point
orthodontists can educate themselves enough to actually interpret
the whole full-volume… I think if you are taking a full-volume
scan, it is very nice to have a radiologist to comment. What we
are finding is – in about four or five percent of our images – the
radiologist finds some pathology.
-Dr. Bob Boyd, "Expert Opinions: CBCT and
Orthodontics," September 2009
Now CBCT scanners have arrived and I think there will be a
split in the way this is going to happen. The fellas that can't afford
to pay for a CBCT scanner will send their patients to a lab for
CBCT scans. But here's the rub. Obsolescence is going to rear its
ugly head in about five years. Exponential growth of CBCT scanners
with better resolution will appear about the time your old
CBCT scanner is completely paid off. So is it better to use a laboratory
where that guy has to buy a new scanner or is it better to
have it in your office? …As I said to an orthodontic resident
recently, "I envy you. I'm at the end of my orthodontic career and
what you're going to experience in your next 40 years is totally different.
You're going to be dealing with genetics and 3D analyses and
ways of treating patients and obtaining growth information we've
never even thought of." The new generation is going to have fun.
-Dr. Ron Redmond, "Expert Opinions: CBCT and
Orthodontics," September 2009
The diagnostic benefits of using the cone beam have been dramatic.
What is amazing to me is what I was not seeing in typical
orthodontic diagnostic records. The clarity of the TMJ; airway from
five different views; anomalies and pathology would never have
been previously detected. …This technology is here to stay. It is especially
helpful for those of us who lecture. It is taking some of the
guesswork out of what is truly happening in our clinical treatment.
-Dr. Ron Roncone, "3D CBCT Imaging for Routine Use
in Orthodontics," December 2009
Cone beam technology is evolving into the standard of care in
the orthodontic practice. This field of view has affected my point of
view on imaging. The scans have helped me to achieve some novel
orthodontic results and have had such a positive impact on my practice
that I couldn't imagine practicing without it.
-Dr. John Graham, "My Point of View on 3D's Field of
View," April 2010
These snapshots from Orthotown Magazine articles give you
a refresher on the invasion of CBCT into the practice of orthodontics.
One of the immediate questions to be answered might
be "Should CBCT scans be used on every patient?" More and
more orthodontists are using CBCT as their primary source of
patient records. It is an individual decision. Some orthodontists
are selectively using CBCT scans for specific diagnostic issues.
They might have their own machine or they might refer
patients to a radiology facility. The following was recently
printed in the PCSO Bulletin: "The PCSO initiated a resolution… about pressure on clinicians to routinely use CBCT scans for
treatment planning. As a result the AAO House of Delegates
decided to add to the 2008 AAO Clinical Practice Guidelines a
statement that acknowledges the 'need' for CBCT scans in some
patients but… it is not 'required' for orthodontic diagnosis and
treatment planning." In my view this is merely tap dancing
around the inevitable.
In the resident program where I teach part-time there have
been concerns expressed about the radiation of CBCT scans,
to the point that the use of CBCT scans for routine diagnosis
(which has been the protocol for the past four years) is going
to be modified and reduced. Consider the presentations at the
recent Fourth International Congress on 3D Dental Imaging:
Radiation effective dose comparisons showed that an i-Cat 8.9
second scan produced 36 microsieverts and a 5.0 second i-Cat
scan produced 20 microsieverts. A digital panoramic can
produce 4.7-26 microsieverts and ceph 2-7 microsieverts. The
radiation difference between the methods of collecting
orthodontic diagnostic records isn't significant but the difference
in the diagnostic information collected with the two
methods is staggering.
To quote Dr. John Graham from his article in this issue of
Orthotown Magazine: "With my full-field-of-view scanner, in
about nine seconds I have the benefit of true orthogonal images,
panoramic, lateral cephalometric, frontal cephalometric, paranasal
sinuses, TMJ and airway views."
Several educators with whom I have communicated say
orthodontic residents need a thorough education on cone beam
applications and interpretations in order to meet the evolving
standard of care.
As for the profession in general, I would refer you to an article
from the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial
Orthopedics (AJO-DO: Vol 136, Number 4) by Riolo and
Vaden who stated: "Our specialty has an obligation and a right to
develop criteria and standards for care. As a professional group, we
must provide quality standards and thus self-regulation. Our right
to self-regulation will end when an outside agency provides all criteria
for care for us."
Until a clear definition of the standard of care is established
by the AAO (or state boards), these controversies will continue.
I am concerned that nothing will be done in a timely
manner by our National Organization to resolve these controversies.
Future legal settlements will have the greatest influence
on clarifying the standard of care relating to CBCT scans.
What I truly fear is the day that a reputable and competent
orthodontist is called into court over a cone beam issue and
the case is won by the attorney who has the most convincing
"expert witness."
I think you will find this issue of Orthotown Magazine one
that you will want to keep handy to read again and again, if
only for the cover story by Don Machen and John Graham,
and also the feature article by Art Curley. I hope you have saved
the past issues that focus on CBCT. If you haven't, you can
always access them online at Orthotown.com and you can even
print copies of articles to start a CBCT file.
Orthotown Magazine will continue to focus on CBCT and
all the issues surrounding this technology. Continue to look to
Orthotown Magazine for CBCT updates as they develop. I
promise you… it is going to get really interesting! |