A Major Model of a Modern Modelmaker
by Benjamin Lund, Editor, Orthotown Magazine
In 2004 Steven Gardner decided to form a small company
specializing in orthodontic study models. In seven years, this
side business, OrthoSelect, went from a one-room basement
company to a national lab. Today OrthoSelect fabricates thousands
of study models for hundreds of doctors each month. "It's
a gratifying start, but we feel it's only the beginning," says
Gardner. Here he describes the details of what the orthodontic
lab business is like, the importance of study models and what is
to come for OrthoSelect.
What is your current business philosophy? How
does your team embrace your mission?
Gardner: OrthoSelect's philosophy has always revolved
around keeping costs as low as possible. However, offering low
prices but returning a poor product will quickly destroy a business.
So to provide a quality product at a low price, we focus on
speed and efficiency. The end result is a quality model, at the
lowest possible price, in the quickest possible time. Ultimately
it's up to the doctors to decide if we're successful in this mission.
As for team members embracing our mission, they understand
and work hard to achieve the balance between high productivity
and high quality. They do an excellent job. We've
developed good systems for processing large amounts of models,
but without a committed staff, none of it would be possible. I
need to be careful though since they'll probably read this article
and argue they deserve a raise (laughs).
Aside from your excellent team, what sets
OrthoSelect apart from the competition?
What's so unique about your company?
Gardner: There are a couple of things. First and foremost
I'd say our product selection sets us apart. Many of our competitors
offer one option at one very expensive price. It's pretty
obvious when speaking with orthodontists that they have different
study model needs. Some doctors want traditional plaster
study models; others have switched to digital models;
others desperately need to free up space and digitize all their
old plaster casts; or maybe they just want a bare bones price
and opt for a one of our "storage" options. We really try to
accommodate and customize our study model services to what
the orthodontist needs.
Second, (and I don't mean to harp on this,) our fees are
really the most competitive of any lab out there. If I had one
wish, doctors would download our software and test a couple
of sample cases. They'll see the quality and we think they'll be
pleased. At the very least, they'll see how much money they
can save.
Lastly, because we have developed systems for efficiency and
quality, we are able to return models quickly. A typical digital
model is returned within a week. That's from the time impressions
are shipped to the time models download to the doctor's
computer. We believe all these factors combine to set us apart
from the competition.
What can orthodontists expect when they call
OrthoSelect?
Gardner: They can expect an actual person to pick up the
phone. It's always annoying when you call a business and a
recorded message picks up. If you're a new doctor calling us, you
can expect to talk with me directly. All day-to-day operations
have been turned over to team members, but when it comes to
new accounts, I take those calls. I like speaking with the doctors
and their staff so we can learn what options are best for them.
We'll always do the first couple cases for free; this way orthodontists
can give us a try then decide whether they want to continue
to use our services.
What new technologies impact the way you
operate? What challenges have you faced?
Gardner: The proverbial digital revolution has single-handedly
changed OrthoSelect. In the early years the goal was
to achieve 100 plaster study models a week. Now with the use
of computers, scanners and well-trained technicians, we are
able to process 800 to 1,000 cases a week. We could never
reach these numbers if we didn't invest in new technologies.
Digital technology also presents itself
as one of the challenges we face.
Honestly, we were somewhat naive when
jumping into the digital pool. Anyone
can purchase a 3D scanner and begin
scanning impressions or stone models – that's the easy part. We quickly found
out that there is a great deal of work
needed after the scanning. Turning those
raw images into acceptable, high quality,
digital models is indeed a challenge. Just
like plaster models, there are still digital
bubbles to remove, holds to fill, rough
areas to sculpt and smooth. It's a lot of
work and takes some experienced technicians
who understand 3D imaging and
how to work with both plaster casts and
high-end computer software.
Companies selling 3D scanners definitely
understate the time, training and
costs associated with digital models. If an
orthodontist is considering purchasing an
in-house scanner, it might be a great purchase.
Just make sure to do the research
and fully understand the time, money and training needed.
Are study models still relevant? Aren't new
technologies making them obsolete?
Gardner: Study models are more relevant than ever for one
simple reason – we live in a litigious society. One in 10 orthodontists
is sued annually, and that number is increasing.¹
According to an article by Dr. Huie-Ming Hou, "Study models
are absolutely essential as starting and finishing records in orthodontic
treatment, apart from constituting critical medico-legal
evidence. Not having starting study models could be grounds
for allegations of negligence."² Many lawsuits are frivolous, but
if you can't provide basic records like an initial study model, it
gives undue creditability to an otherwise unsubstantiated claim.
In the article "On Legal Issues in Orthodontics"³ in the
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, the author interviews defense
attorney Dr. Donald E. Machen who states that avoiding malpractice
suits means "taking a little extra time to prepare high
quality diagnostic records and document proper treatment
records." Study models play a central role in keeping basic,
proper records.
Surprisingly some orthodontists don't even include study
models in their orthodontic care. Why cut corners when the
downside could ruin your practice? That's why we provide a
bare-bones, low-cost storage model. It's
precisely for orthodontists who don't
want or use study models but understand
the importance of keeping good
records for if and when a lawsuit occurs.
What specific products and
new services do you offer?
Gardner: I mentioned earlier our
variety of products. Specifically, it breaks
down to three categories: digital, archival
and physical. Within each category there
are three additional choices. With these
options we can cover just about every
study model need an orthodontist might
have. On the digital side we provide a
3D "full finish" and "rough finish"
model. This rough option is for doctors
who don't necessary utilize models in
consults or treatment planning, but still
want access for clarification or verification.
Keep in mind our rough finish
models are very rough, but they can be
upgraded to a full finish model anytime
(see Fig. A). We also offer diagnostic data reports that contain
Bolton, space and tooth width analysis, along with palatal and
ideal arch measurements.
Of course we still provide traditional plaster models. Here
we have three options: full, semi and rough. Each depends on
the level of detail the doctor wants.
In the last six months we've added several new products.
Under our archival category, we provide storage services, both
physical and digital. These options are for doctors we described
above who literally never look at or use study models. However,
if a lawsuit occurs, they certainly will need that specific patient's
study model. We would retrieve the model from storage,
upgrade it to full finish quality then send it back to the doctor.
Fees for our archival products are extremely low.
We also now offer conversion services where we digitize a
doctor's old plaster models into digital files. This frees up a ton of space and is much easier to access than digging through old
boxes to find a case. We can also convert a digital study model
back into a physical model. This is called 3D printing and something
doctors appreciate because it provides peace of mind
knowing any digital model can be returned in physical form.
Do you offer ABO certification?
Gardner: Yes, we offer both digital and plaster certification.
The cost is higher because additional time is spent ensuring a finished
model is as close to perfection as possible. For digital certification
we work closely with GeoDigm. They are a great
company and we enjoy a terrific working relationship with them.
They have developed excellent software for scoring models that
the board utilizes and accepts. Traditional certification with plaster
models is done in-house at OrthoSelect. However, we only
provide ABO certification for doctors already using our services.
Unfortunately we don't have the manpower to produce ABO
models for any and all orthodontists needing ABO certification.
What about alginate distortion and shipping
across the country?
Gardner: All alginates are definitely not created equal. We do
see problems with dimensional stability, but it is a solvable issue.
Of course, PVS materials are the most stable. You could wait
weeks to pour up polyvinyl impressions. Yet, they're more
expensive and additional time is needed to create them. We've
had great success with five-day (120-hour) alginates too. The
alginates we use and recommend are Hydrogum5, Alginmax,
Identic and Essix.
To what do you attribute OrthoSelect's success?
Gardner: Working our tails off has contributed! Finding
solutions to doctors' needs and obsessing about finding techniques
that maximize productivity has helped as well. With better
efficiency, costs are reduced, which in turn lower our prices.
That's what it always comes back to – high quality and low cost.
Good customer service, knowledgeable tech support and a quick
turnaround are all factors too. We hope this formula will continue
to create consistent growth.
What does the future hold for OrthoSelect?
Gardner: Introducing new technologies has certainly
increased our ability to fabricate high quality, low-cost orthodontic
study models. Looking to the future we see new technologies
that might help expand our line of products – from
indirect bonding, to cone beam conversions, to robotic wire
bending for appliances; or clear aligners and retainers within
hours instead of days. There are some exciting technologies on
the horizon. Time will tell which ones will take hold.
Currently, we're focusing on new methods that will help
increase our quality and efficiency. Specifically we want to maximize
the use of impressions. Kill two birds with one stone
where one impression (or intra-oral scan) is used to produce not
only a digital model, but also a Herbst, Schwartz, Hawley or
corrective aligners. Why take multiple impressions if one will do
the trick? We're running a pilot program with half a dozen doctors
now. Once we've worked out the bugs, we're looking forward
to offering doctors so much more than just study models.
Stay tuned.
For more information about OrthoSelect, visit
www.myorthoselect.com, call 866-695-3319
or e-mail models@myorthoselect.com.
References
- JCO INTERVIEWS Donald E. Machen, DMD, JD (Robert M. Bubin, DMD), on
Legal Issues in Orthodontics – Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; Vol 26:06; 347-
353; 1992
- Hong Kong Dental Journal 2006; 3:107-15; The uses of orthodontic study models in
diagnosis and treatment planning
- JCO INTERVIEWS Donald E. Machen, DMD, JD (robert M. Bubin, DMD), on
Legal Issues in Orthodontics – Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; Vol 26:06; 347-
353; 1992
|