
In my 12-plus years as a clinical orthodontist, I have seen several
trends develop in my practice with the management of my patients. In
my opinion, orthodontics today has really become a childhood rite of
passage. Our adolescent patients are typically incredibly excited and nervous
on the day we move them into treatment with their braces. At the
appointment following the placement of their braces, either the patient
or the parent will make a comment in regards to how incredibly
impressed they are with the positive changes that have taken place with
their treatment in such a short period of time. As we move through the
course of their orthodontic treatment, we always get asked the question,
"When will my braces be coming off?" And finally, one of the happiest
days in a child's life is the day they get their braces removed. However, all
that joy and elation is then tempered when they find out retainers are also
required as part of their treatment.
One of the most difficult challenges we have always faced in orthodontics
is with the management of retention for our patients. In our profession,
there is really no general consensus in regards to what type of
retention is better: removable vs. fixed. A recent study published in the
AJO-DO concluded that the two most commonly used retainers in the
United States are: maxillary Hawley retainer (58.2 percent) and
mandibular fixed retainer (40.2 percent).¹ As we all know, there are pros
and cons to both types of retention.
Without a doubt, the greatest advantage of the removable retainer is
for hygiene. Regardless of the design of the removable retainer, it can be
taken out of the mouth to allow the patient to floss and brush without
any interference. The removable retainer will also help to maintain the
arch form that has been developed during the course of orthodontic treatment.
The biggest disadvantage with the removable retainer is with compliance
of wear. Other negatives include its affect on speech and the
appearance of the patient with the removable retainer in the mouth. Both
of these factors will also impact the compliance with wear of the removable
retainer. Obviously, if patients are non-compliant this will result in
tooth movement.
In contrast, the greatest advantage of the fixed retainer is that it
removes compliance from the picture. The fixed retainer has an aesthetic
advantage, as it sits on the inside surfaces of the patient's anterior
teeth. However, the biggest disadvantage is hygiene, especially over a
long period of time. We all hear this complaint from the general dentists
and hygienists in our communities and sometimes even from the
parents or patients. Failure with the bonding of the fixed retainer can
also result in tooth movement especially if the patient is unaware this
has happened.
As a result, there really is no right or wrong answer when the decision
needs to be made in regard to what type of retainer to use. The
choice for retention really is the individual clinician's and patient's
choice. My standard retention protocol involves giving the patient two
removable Essix Ace retainers in the maxillary arch and bonding a
mandibular fixed retainer. For my fixed retainer, I utilize a braided wire
that has been heat treated to anneal the wire resulting in a very malleable
and passive wire that can be adapted and bonded to every single tooth
from canine to canine. If a patient makes a specific request for a certain
type of retainer, I will give them that option.
Whatever the choice for retention, we must remember that stability
with retention can only be accomplished if the forces that are derived
from the periodontal and gingival tissues, the orofacial soft tissues, the
occlusion and post-treatment facial growth and development are all in
balance.2,3,4 We must remember to reinforce to our patients that management
of retention is a lifelong commitment. The only way to ensure
stability with retention is to educate patients and give them options.
References
- Valiathan, M and Hughes, E. Results of a survey-based study to determine common retention practices in the
United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;13:170-177
- Moss, JP. The soft tissue environment of teeth and jaws: an experimental and clinical study: Part 1. Br J
Orthod. 1980;7:127-137
- Moss, JP. The soft tissue environment of teeth and jaws: an experimental and clinical study: Parts 2 and 3. Br
J Orthod. 1980;7:205-216
- Blake, M and Bibby, K. Retention and stability: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1998;114:299-306
|