by John M. Pobanz DDS, MS
In 2004, I went to hear Dr. David Hatcher speak about the
latest convergence in digital imaging in orthodontics. Cone
beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines were becoming
popular on the market and were able to reveal new aspects of the
patient anatomy and provide exciting treatment possibilities.
Dr. Hatcher spent a good deal of time describing the “virtual
patient,” a digital replication of the “anatomical truth” that
could be constructed using data from two-dimensional photographs,
X-rays and 3D CBCT data. Recent advances in desktop
and intra-oral scanners have given orthodontists additional data
to use toward the creation of the virtual patient. With these
devices and exciting new advances in software, practitioners can
now incorporate precise surface data from the teeth and gums
and use this information for an exciting array of treatment
possibilities. In his Journal of Clinical Orthodontics cutting edge
article earlier this year, Dr. Ron Redmond wrote, “In the race
between CBCT and scanning technologies, it appears to me that
the intra-oral scanner has taken the lead and is sprinting toward
the finish line.”
The two primary means for acquiring digital impression
data in office is through the use of desktop scanners, which
scan impressions and models, and intra-oral scanners, which
can take direct digital impressions. Both types of scanners
have several key benefits and limitations that will be
described. After the image is acquired, the orthodontist has an
exciting set of possibilities for his or her digital data.
Archiving, measuring, producing virtual setups, as well as fabricating
various appliances all are now possible by utilizing
these systems. Many of the systems allow for the creation of a
non-proprietary file that can easily be uploaded to a lab so an
appliance can be constructed. And some of the newest intraoral
scanners and software can be used for printing aligners
and other appliances directly in your office, reducing costs
and time associated with outside fabrication.
Desktop Scanners
While digital study models have been available (e.g.,
Cadent’s OrthoCAD service), several new options exist for
orthodontists to scan models to create a digital file in their own
offices. Several companies have emerged over the past few years,
which provide small desktop-scanning devices that can be used
to scan models in office. These systems provide an easy way to
quickly scan models for storage and also include a variety of software
applications. For example, Motion View, Inc., provides a popular desktop scanning solution and offers a host of after-scan
features such as ABO and Bolton analyses, measuring tools and
the ability to combine scan data with CBCT data. Data is saved
in non-proprietary file format so that it can be uploaded to a
dental lab for appliance fabrication. An increasing number of
dental labs are able to work with the digital files from the scanners
to fabricate aligners, Hawley, retainers and a variety of
orthodontic appliances.
Desktop scanning solutions can be an effective way to store
and retrieve study models. I know several orthodontists who
paid for their system after reducing model storage fees in less
than one year. The scan time is relatively quick and can be done
by an assistant with minimal training. Although less expensive
than intra-oral scanners, the major drawback to the desktop
solutions is that unlike intra-oral scanners, they still require
impressions. This disparity will likely become even greater as
intra-oral scanners essentially eliminate traditional impressions
and are able to digitize stone models. In addition, desktop scanners
have difficulty capturing undercuts in impressions, particularly
with crowded lower incisors. Nevertheless, they can provide
a useful, cost-efficient way to eliminate model storage, offer
treatment-planning tools and deliver a digital output necessary
to fabricate appliances.
Intra-oral Scanners
Intra-oral scanners have been popular in general dentistry
for years. These handheld wand-type devices connect directly to
a computer, large monitor and voice-guided software to assist in
capturing the digital impression. The utilization of these scanners
gives the dentist the ability to produce a variety of restorations
and cosmetic applications such as crown and bridges,
veneers and inlays directly from the digital impression. Sirona’s
CEREC system is the most utilized scanner in dentistry,
although there are an increasing number of units being offered.
These include 3M’s Lava system, the E4D system from Henry
Schein, the iTero scanner from Cadent and the IOS FastScan.
As is the case with many new technologies that are designed for
the general practitioner, it isn’t long before they reach the orthodontic
market.
The scanners developed for orthodontics are able to scan
the entire arch relatively quickly and precisely, and eliminate
the tasks associated with conventional impressions completely.
Not surprisingly, patients’ preference of digital impressions
over conventional ones is significant (77 percent in Sonis, et
al., 2010 JCO study). Soon we will see a whole host of intraoral
scanners at the orthodontic meetings, led by the iTero
scanner from Cadent (which was purchased by Invisalign in
2011). The iTero scans can be quickly uploaded to Invisalign,
used to produce aligners and are also available for OrthoCAD
digital model system. Many other companies including 3M
and IOS FastScan will have intra-oral scanners on the market
for orthodontists soon.
There are several important factors to evaluate when considering
these devices, the first of which is the cost. Intra-oral
scanning systems can range from $20-55K and some of these
systems also charge “per scan” fees for converting and saving
files. It is important to factor in these fees and to determine if
the system allows for saving non-proprietary files (usually STL)
that can be used by most dental labs. Similar to low-cost color
printers, the long-term costs of replacing ink cartridges (paying
“per click” fees with scanners) often outweigh lower up-front
expense. In addition, scan times between systems vary significantly.
I have heard reports of full scans ranging from five to
30 minutes depending on the patient and scanning system –
clearly an important variable when choosing a system. Finally,
many of the scanners require a small amount of coating on the
teeth to improve the quality of the scan, the notable exception
being the iTero system. While this coating might add slightly
to operating expenses and chairtime, it can also improve the
scan quality.
Putting it All Together
All the mentioned scanning devices are equipped with software
to record the scan and to save the digital file. Two notable
companies have incorporated the intra-oral scan data in
enhanced ways. The first of these is Anatomage, a CBCT software
system, which is widely used among orthodontists. The
company offers its InVivo software on many new 3D CBCT
machines and allows for the reconstruction, measurement, simulation
and manipulation of CBCT data. It also offers several
services, including the creation of surgical guides and digital
models created from a single CBCT scan with its Anatomodels
service. With the addition of the digital study model to existing
CBCT data and photos, the practitioner is able to visualize both
hard and soft tissues, gingival lines and coloration. These digital
models can be extremely useful in the creation of surgical guides,
temporary anchorage device placement and bracket positioning.
Anatomage also provides viewing software so that the digital file
may be easily shared with any specialist involved with the case.
Vultus Orthodontic Technologies is another interesting
company, which enables the orthodontist to scan, manipulate
and print appliances on site. The foundation of the software was
built by Rapidform, a leader in 3D CAD software systems that
has developed CAD systems in the automotive, aerospace and
other high-tech industries. The Vultus product allows the orthodontist
to use a desktop or intra-oral scanner of his or her choice
to capture the data and then manipulate the data using CAD
software. With some basic training, it is easy for the user to
make quick adjustments to the digital impression to create
sequential tooth movements. Once these changes are saved to
the file, they can be easily printed in the office using a 3D
printer or uploaded to a lab for fabrication. Since the orthodontist
is in control of the design of the appliances, he can quickly
print as many as are needed for the individual case. And the cost
of creating aligners and other appliances is significantly
decreased since the movements are planned by the orthodontist
and fabricated locally. Dr. Todd Ehrler, the CEO of Vultus says,
“This technology is the future of orthodontics. Our focus is
combining cutting-edge technology with the professional training
and judgment of the orthodontic specialist. We show orthodontists
how to implement this technology in their practices and
then get out of their way.”
The Future
The dental anatomical truth and the virtual patient are
much closer today than they were even five years ago. The addition
of digital impressions to the clinical picture adds an important
new dimension in constructing the virtual patient. One can
imagine the not too-distant-future when smaller, less invasive
devices will be used to record the intra-oral areas and will be
fully integrated with hard- and soft-tissue data. These devices
will be able to directly transfer data to software, which will allow
the doctor to manipulate the file and push it directly to fabrication.
Soon, a fully integrated model of the entire dental anatomy
will be available and as common as a chairside computer terminal.
As mentioned, technology is now available to allow for the
production of appliances directly in the orthodontists’ office.
Adding digital impressions with existing photographic records,
2D X-rays and 3D digital imaging pushes the orthodontists’
understanding of the patient’s anatomical truth to new levels.
The increasing precision and dynamic confluence of digital data
continues to make it an exciting time to be an orthodontist.
|