Dental X-rays sensationalized by a media report of
a seriously flawed study with major funding provided
by a Meningioma Foundation reported that dental Xrays
increase the risk of formation of a brain tumor.
This was the topic of a message board that was
reviewed in the May issue of Orthotown Magazine.
The study showed that those with the brain tumor
reported significantly higher rates of having dental Xrays
than the control (from their own memory of the
past, not dental records). What's weird is that it was
shown to be significant in those that had reported
bitewings and panoramics but not in those reporting a
history of full-mouth series. That makes no sense.
The American Academy of Oral Maxillofacial
Radiology (AAOMR) issued a response to this study
restating its commitment to “the responsible use of
ionizing radiation in dentistry.” In its response it
noted: One major weakness of this study was the requirement
for subjects to recall their dental radiography history
from decades ago when they were children. Second, bitewing radiographs were reported to place patients at a
higher risk of meningioma than a full-mouth series of
radiographs (up to 20 exposures, two to four of which are
bitewings); a finding that cannot be rationally reconciled
from a radiobiological standpoint. Its conclusion was:
“A number of irreconcilable data collection and consistency
problems highlight serious flaws in the study and
render the conclusions invalid.”
The April 2012 press release from the American
Dental Association (ADA) states: “Studies have shown
that the ability to recall information is often imperfect.
Therefore, the results of studies that use this design can be unreliable because they are affected by what scientists call
‘recall bias.’”
One can also factor in that the study subjects
received dental X-rays decades ago when radiation
rates were higher due to the use of old X-ray technology
and slower-speed film producing greater radiation
exposure.
The question now might be: “Have patients or
friends recently asked you about radiation from
dental X-rays?” And, more importantly, have patients
(or parents) refused having a panorex taken on their
initial visit or during treatment? Another Townie
responded: “If a patient refuses a panorex, I won't
treat them. Who knows what pathology can be hiding
in the jaws somewhere.” Even Dr. Oz is adding fuel to
the fire, via his nationally syndicated TV show, by
relating thyroid cancer to having dental X-rays.
Another Townie stated: “Our specialty has to have an
evidence-based pow wow on the use of radiographs in
orthodontics and figure out if the standard of care
needs to be revised.”
Have you had these issues arise in your office?
And if you have, how have you answered the questions
and supported your response to the need for
radiographs to diagnose and treat your patients?
Orthotown Magazine has published many articles
regarding CBCT and its associated radiation facts, the
most recent in the September 2011 issue titled, “The
Truth about CBCT Radiation.” The authors are practicing
orthodontists who have made a prudent decision
about the application of cone beam images in
their practices, within the ALARA principles set forth
by the ADA and the AAOMR, to balance patient
benefit with risk.
You can download the September 2011 digital issue
of Orthotown Magazine from Orthotown.com
and find
the article, complete with dosimetry graphs, charts, definitions
and comparisons starting on page 62.
To continue our commitment to provide our
readers with the most current information regarding
radiation in dentistry and with a focus on CBCT, we
are pleased to present this 2012 CBCT issue of
Orthotown Magazine.
|