Interproximal reduction is an integral part of solving
specific orthodontic tooth size discrepancies. Since I developed
the IPR protocol and DVD for Invisalign in 2002, I
recently refined and improved the technique for more accuracy
and precision.
Dr. Jack Sheridan says, "Interproximal reduction is the
process of making incremental reductions to tooth enamel to
create sufficient space between teeth for successful movement/
realignment." Dr. Sheridan documented air-rotor stripping in
his 1985 publication. It has been established that the technique
for posterior tooth-size reduction (distal to cuspids) was best
accomplished with the air-rotor approach. However, the
approach to IPR from cuspid to cuspid is more easily, accurately
and precisely accomplished with a different technique.
Dr. Sheridan clearly identified the correct form of an interproximal
opening between teeth and he also clearly defined the
"fatal error" (Fig. 1) of creating the incorrect interproximal
opening. When the opening is correct, the opposing surfaces
that have been reduced must be parallel or converging toward
the incisal to create the proper form of the opening (Figs. 2 and
3). Form is equally important as the size of the opening!
I developed a refined technique for IPR that is more comfortable
for the patient and more accurate and precise for the
doctor. It involves a simple four-step approach.
Step 1: Opening Contacts
Previously, I used a single-sided Flex-
View interproximal strip which was "seesawed"
back and forth between two teeth
until the contact was separated (Fig. 4). It
was generally uncomfortable for the
patient and inefficient for the doctor.
The new technique utilizes the flexible,
single-sided blades of the Ortho-
Slenderizer (Fig. 5). This unique rechargeable instrument with
a specialized contact opener blade enables a gentle polishing
movement to begin the process of separating the contact
between teeth (Fig. 6). I have utilized both approaches with a
single patient and without hesitation the Slenderizer was preferred
over the "seesaw" technique.
Step 2: Reducing Enamel
Using the right and left single-sided blades of the Slenderizer
will complete the opening of the contact to .20mm as measured
with the thickness gauge.
Step 3: Placing the Disc and Polishing
After the contact opening is .20, the 915 finishing disc (single-
sided) can easily be placed between the teeth such that the
thin 1.5mm abrasive area is below the contact area of the teeth
(Fig. 7). The tongue and lip can easily be protected with a
mouth mirror on the lingual and the doctor protecting the lip
on the labial.
Using a slow speed straight handpiece, the 915 disc can then
be rotated (rotation always toward the mirror) and can be moved
in a sweeping motion from gingival to incisal to begin the
achievement of the target opening while producing parallel sides.
Each opposing surface is gently polished alternatively with gentle
upward sweeping motions of the 915 disc. The opening must be
frequently measured with the thickness gauges (Fig. 8) until the
proper size is achieved and the gauge confirms that the proper
"form" has been established, avoiding the fatal error." (Fig. 9).
Step 4: Finishing the Anatomic Contours
Using the Flex-View strip, the labial and lingual line angles
must be restored after IPR (Fig. 10).
The Goal
The goal is to create the precise IPR size and form of the
interproximal reduction, as required for the case, and to have
your patient return to his general dentist without detecting any
surfaces have been slenderized.
Clinical Guidelines
First and foremost, there will never be a replacement for
clinical judgment and experience. The evaluation of which tooth surfaces can be reduced is of utmost importance. Computergenerated
IPR guidelines or the doctor’s personal selection of
tooth size analysis is critical for accuracy. IPR reductions must be
done on the anatomical contact area of the tooth and at right
angles to the M/D axis of the tooth (Fig. 11).
The finished contact opening must be the proper size and
form. Tooth anatomy must be restored after slenderization.
Every clinician will evaluate technique and decide on the
approach to IPR that is the most comfortable for him/her. This
technique shows the use of an exposed disc with the tongue
being protected by a mirror and the lips retracted safely with
the doctor’s fingers. The disc is always revolved toward the mirror
(not toward the lip). This approach offers the best direct
visualization and control of the enamel reduction process. When practiced carefully, there is no risk of injury to the
patient’s soft tissues. There are disc guards (metal and plastic)
that can be used, but they severely limit the view of the tooth
surface being reduced and add a large degree of inaccuracy to
the process. There are also other stripping instruments from
oscillating to reciprocating to vibrating that will also reduce
enamel. However, the key to accuracy in size and form of the
space created by IPR is best achieved in the finishing steps by
using the 915 disc. This disc and the finishing step of this technique
are often omitted from the IPR process, regardless of the
choice of the other materials and instruments by the clinician.
The use of this technique is more clearly described in a comprehensive
IPR manual and an accompanying DVD which is
now available.
|