Earned Placement: OrthoSelect Dibs AI

Earned Placement: OrthoSelect Dibs AI 

Two practitioners discuss how indirect bonding with Dibs AI has made practice more predictable and profitable


Laura Bonner
Dr. Laura Bonner
David Caggiano
Dr. David Caggiano


From the beginning, traditional indirect bonding (IDB) as a replacement for direct bonding faced challenges. Early attempts to digitize were difficult, including ineffective or complicated software and inaccurate bracket placement. Yet, recent digital advancements, including artificial intelligence, improved 3D printing and even better print resins have radically changed IDB. Digital IDB today appears to have finally matured into a simpler, more practical and powerful tool for saving time and improving overall case outcomes. OrthoSelect, which has spent eight years perfecting digital IDB software and 3D-printed transfer trays, recently launched Dibs AI, an integrated software platform that brings IDB to a new level of ease and accuracy. To gain a better perspective on how digital IDB can change the way orthodontists practice, we spoke with two doctors who use Dibs AI: Dr. Laura Bonner (Bonner Orthodontics, Rogers, Arkansas) and Dr. David Caggiano (Caggiano Orthodontics, Parsippany, New Jersey).

Tell us a little bit about you and your practice.

Bonner: I was born and raised in Colorado and attended dental school at the University of Colorado, with my orthodontic residency at the University of Iowa. After that, I opened my practice in 2015.

Caggiano: I’ve been practicing orthodontics since 2008. In college, I received a master’s in biomedical engineering, so I have a good background to assimilate technology into my practice.

How long have you been doing indirect bonding (IDB)?

Bonner: I was introduced to IDB as a technique in residency and have indirectly bonded ever since.

Caggiano: I’ve been doing IDB since 2009.

What other IDB systems have you used other than OrthoSelect’s Dibs AI? How does your current experience differ?

Bonner: I’ve used traditional IDB [with plaster models] in the past. Once I incorporated intraoral scanning into my practice, I immediately started researching for digital versions of indirect bonding. Dibs AI kept coming up as an outstanding system, and OrthoSelect as an outstanding company, and the reviews I read online have matched my experience.

Caggiano: I’ve tried almost every IDB system. The great part about the Dibs AI platform is its in-house option—case setups and printing are all done by my staff. Sliding brackets under the gingiva is a great unique feature, too.

What has been your general experience using IDB?


Bonner: Like many doctors, I found traditional IDB somewhat laborious. After I learned the ropes, though, Dibs AI software became intuitive, with individual display settings for moving brackets and customizable to how I like “seeing” bracket placement. The simulated outcome is a powerful diagnostic tool and is accurate to what I achieve clinically. Trays are very consistently excellent quality. They hold our brackets in place perfectly—not too tight, not too loose! It’s easy to determine that the tray is seated properly on the teeth during bonding.

Caggiano: There is a difference between Dibs AI and traditional IDB. Most doctors think of IDB with transfer trays, braces and custom pads. The disadvantage is you’re adhering multiple layers of glue, which is not as strong and lends to error and debonds. With Dibs AI, there is no glue on the pad of the brace—it’s similar to direct bonding, but using the transfer tray to place the brackets. There is no adjusting the brace; they just go on, are light-cured and lead to a strong bond.

How much of a learning curve was there when implementing IDB in your practice?

Bonner: My team was instrumental in shortening the learning curve. They are disciplined in the prep of teeth and trays. That’s imperative for success with any IDB system.

Caggiano: Virtually zero learning curve—placing the braces on with IDB is much easier clinically than direct bonding. There is a small curve when looking at the position of the braces on a computer, as opposed to in the mouth, but you learn quickly.

What benefits have you seen using IDB versus direct bonding?

Bonner: More accurate bracket placement, which translates to better root parallelism, reduced marginal ridge discrepancies and reduced wire bending and/or repos. For multidisciplinary patients, Dibs AI software is a very powerful communication tool with referring doctors. For example, I will send a screenshot of the simulated final tooth position to a patient’s dentist when planning postorthodontic restorative treatment. Getting feedback on final tooth position before bonding is certainly valuable. This type of communication has not only strengthened my referral relationship with some excellent doctors but also streamlined care when collaboration between doctors is required.

Caggiano: I am at the chair for three minutes so, obviously, less doctor time. The braces are placed far more accurately than I can do directly—I don’t care how good you are at direct, indirect is more accurate. Additionally, there are fewer bond failures because the trays are precise and light-cured immediately. Also, there is less excess cement. When there is excess, it’s occlusal, not gingival, which obviously is easier to clean and better for the gingiva.

Has IDB saved you time?

Bonner: Chairside time on bonding day is certainly shorter, compared with direct bonding.

Caggiano: Doctor time for an IDB is almost one-third of that for a direct bond. But there is also less mental energy required. Doing seven IDBs in a morning is easy. Seven direct bonds … it gets a little draining. Another advantage is the turnaround time is extremely fast. We do same-day cases with in-house printing, or OrthoSelect can print and ship for late next-day bonds. This system in particular has decreased the number of appointments for overall treatment. We are finishing the majority of cases in minimal visits, thus increasing profitability.

How long do you typically spend in the software on case setups?

Bonner: OrthoSelect does the initial setup for me; I then adjust and approve. About five minutes total for me.

Caggiano: My lab technician spends about seven minutes in the software for preliminary bracket placement. It takes me just a few minutes for final setup, then two minutes to have the computer generate the trays.

Do you delegate any IDB work— case setups, bonding appointments— to your assistants, or do you do all the work yourself?

Bonner: As mentioned, we use OrthoSelect for the initial setup. It also prints and ships the trays. Then my staff places the brackets in the trays. On bonding day, my staff prepares the teeth and I place the trays and bond. They remove the trays and tie in archwires.

Caggiano: The entire process can be delegated. My lab technician and some assistants are trained to do the initial setup in the software, I like to do the final adjustments, and then my team 3D-prints the IDB trays. As far as the clinical procedure, my assistants prepare the patient, but in New Jersey the doctor has to place the braces, so I come to the chair, slide on the four quadrants separately and tack-cure the braces in place. My assistants finish curing.

Has there been a financial benefit from implementing IDB? If so, how do you measure it?

Bonner: I’m not sure of exact figures—I think anytime you strive for excellence, the money will work itself out in immeasurable ways: more referrals, better patient experience, better collaboration with dentists. Compared with other digital IDB systems, I think OrthoSelect’s costs are reasonable.

Caggiano: We measure production per doctor hour, production per team member per hour, and dollars per visit for each patient. I’m in a couple of study clubs, and our numbers are at the high end for all those metrics.

What has been your experience printing in-house?

Bonner: We may consider in-house printing in the future, but we’re happy with OrthoSelect doing the printing—less mess and hassle for us. Its turnaround time is excellent.

Caggiano: We are proficient with 3D printing in house. I have a lab coordinator who is very good with following each step exactly during production. With 200 cases and counting, we’ve never had a 3D-printed IDB tray that didn’t fit—it’s very predictable.

What has been your patients’ experience with IDB?

Bonner: At initial consultation and bonding day, I often get comments of how great it is that technology has improved the process of putting braces on.

Caggiano: Patients are more comfortable with Dibs AI trays, compared with other systems we’ve used. We utilize Nola retractors. Most doctors are aware that suction tubes sometimes get in the way with some IDB systems. We worked closely with OrthoSelect and helped design transfer trays with minimal occlusal and no lingual coverage on the 6s and 7s, so the IDB trays slide on easily.

What advice would you give to your colleagues considering implementing IDB in their practices?

Bonner: I know IDB often gets a bad rap for “extra lab work time” and increased bond failures. However, these two factors can be overcome quickly with a good system in place in your office. IDB has become accurate, quick and predictable for me. Training staff is going to be the most important part of successful IDB integration.

Caggiano: Research shows that IDB is more accurate than direct bonding. It also requires less doctor time and leads to fewer visits and fewer broken braces. I honestly can’t understand why all orthodontists don’t do IDB. If the cost per case is an issue, then a mindset change is needed. Better bracket placement, less doctor time, fewer broken braces equals greater profitability. I challenge everyone to just give it a try—you have nothing to lose and so much to gain!



DISCOVER MORE ABOUT DIBS AI
AND INDIRECT BONDING ADVANCES

To learn more about how Dibs AI can transform
your practice, visit dibsai.com.

Sponsors
Townie® Poll
Do you have a dedicated insurance coordinator in your office?
  
Sally Gross, Member Services Specialist
Phone: +1-480-445-9710
Email: sally@farranmedia.com
©2025 Orthotown, a division of Farran Media • All Rights Reserved
9633 S. 48th Street Suite 200 • Phoenix, AZ 85044 • Phone:+1-480-598-0001 • Fax:+1-480-598-3450