In the 1933 novel, Lost Horizons, a troubled
member of the British Diplomatic Service seeks to
find the perfect place. Dubbed "Shangri-La," it had
everything: peace, harmony among its beautiful
inhabitants, and endless longevity for all. It also had
the very attributes that many orthodontists consider
the "perfect" place to practice: no competition,
fee-for-service patients and a faithful patient
base. So, does the perfect place to practice orthodontics
exist only in fantasy or remote history, or
can it be found today?
The point is not to find the perfect place where
every aspect of practice is seamlessly and effortlessly
discovered. Rather, the goal is to find an acceptable
place where a hard working professional can build a
practice in sufficiently fertile soil, take root and
thrive. Experience has shown that there are some
elements of a practice location that must be present,
but not all of these practice elements are equally
necessary nor must they be found in precisely the
same quantities to justify the planting of an office.
Fertile Soil
Ironically, this is not the first aspect of a practice
location that many clients ask about, particularly
those who are young. Instead, they want to
find a place with no competition. Finding a place
with no other orthodontists has some advantages
but as discussed later, it is also an indication of
why that place might not be suitable.
When we speak of fertile soil, there are two
aspects to be considered when looking for the
ideal place to practice. The first is the number of
potential patients. The second is the potential
for growth.
In the first case, we know that many people of
all ages and income strata need and deserve a good
orthodontist. But the simple fact remains that
there is a subset of the general population that is
more inclined to seek this specialty to a far greater
degree than others – adolescents, 10-14 years old.
Sure, many patients older than 14 (or younger)
seek to get braces (or their parents want to get them on their behalf ). But if we are examining a
site for its potential, we want to find a place with
a significant number in this age range because it is
an indicator of future growth for the practice.
While it is tempting to consider a population
that has a large percentage of this age group, this
is not really an answer to the area’s potential. In
most communities in the U.S., the average percentage
of 10-to-14 year olds ranges between five
and 6.5 percent. But if the base population is
small, even if the percentage is 10 percent, there
may not be sufficient potential patients to support
a full-time practice. For this reason, knowing
the percentage of adolescents in the potential
age range is helpful but it is not the answer to the
area’s fertility for practice. This is especially true
of a new or start-up practice.
Instead, we want to know the actual number
(or census) of 10-to-14 year olds. Even if that percentage
is only four percent of the total, if there are
enough of them, a practice can flourish. Typically,
we look at a census of 10-to-14 year olds to fall
into the range of 1,500 to 2,500 within a practice
draw area (PDA). The trick is to find what the
PDA is for a particular practice area. To take a realworld
example, if we consider Peoria, Illinois, the
community draws from a 15-minute drive-time
area. For anyone who has been to Peoria, there are
many outlying communities that depend upon
this city for its jobs, entertainment, retail activity
and professional services. Residents in the outlying
neighborhoods think that driving 15-minutes to
get into town is no big deal. On the other hand,
practices in Atlanta, Georgia, which has a much
larger and densely populated downtown have to
expect that people will want an orthodontist that
is five minutes away by car. Therefore, the PDA is
smaller and more concentrated on the population
near that site.
There is an additional caveat, however. If the
households that these 10-to-14 year olds fit a particularly
desirable demographic character, the
lower range will support a practice much easier
than one where they don’t fit that character. There
are several demographic factors we consider. These
include the educational-attainment level of parents,
disposable income and housing type. There
are more factors to consider but these are the big
three. If parents are well-educated, have money,
and live in an owner-occupied housing unit, it
tends to yield more potential patients.
The other aspect of a practice area’s fertility
has to do with potential for growth. There are
many ways to define this and they differ from
one region of the country to another. True, if
there are more people moving into an area, an
orthodontist will have an easier time with a new
practice. It is no surprise that as one drives up to
the site, there is an orthodontist sign to greet you.
We look at development when it comes to potential
for growth. For example, in our neighborhood,
there is relatively little new housing growth
(particularly for single-family homes). On the
other hand, ground has just been broken for a
fourth office park near an interstate freeway. A
large federal project is likely to open in the next
year that will employ many thousands of new
workers. Is there sufficient population to support a new orthodontic practice right now? Probably
not. But if you want to consider locations ahead
of the curve, it makes sense to put a location like
this on the map.
Much of what we and other location researchers
do is keep track of development and assess what its
nature is and its impact upon continued growth.
By the time the numbers for new housing are
released, it is often too late. That is why development
potential often trumps population growth as
we look for practices that are ideal.
Competition Revealed
"Find me a place with no competitors!" No
problem! There are lots of places that are inaccessible
and secret. You just don’t want them. When
such a location is presented, our first research
question is, why is no one there now? There is a
good reason. It is most often too few potential
patients, poor employment, development or a
strongly negative demographic character. Actually,
we have found that a little competition can be a
very good thing.
Even a savvy orthodontist can be driven to distraction
trying to count the number of potential
competitors, let alone real orthodontists. That is
why the most important place to practice is in the places with most fertility. Some orthodontists are
stuck on the idea that the competition-to-patient
ratio is the most important. The number we use is
on a sliding scale. If you have one orthodontist to
1,250 10-to-14 year olds in a defensible PDA, you
are in a threshold practice location for a start-up.
This assumes that the demographic character of
residents is average and the overhead is not excessive.
Just keep in mind, this is a guideline and not
a commandment. We want growth and development
to go along with that threshold. In locations
that have a poor demographic character, that number
could easily go up to one orthodontist to 4,000
10-to-14 year olds before a practice can really
make a go of it.
The best place to practice is definitely not
inaccessible, remote or secret. It will be where the
people are. But finding the right people in sufficient
numbers is not something that will fall into
your lap. There are outstanding locations in the
United States right now for the right doctor who
is willing to do the research.
|