by John M. Pobanz DDS, MS
Case History and Analysis
This 18-year-old Caucasian female presented with the
following chief complaint: “I want my front teeth to come
together when my teeth are straight.” Upon smiling, there is
5mm of gingival display (Fig. 1). Molar canine relationships
are a half-step Class II. An anterior open bite of 5mm is
measured at the right maxillary lateral incisor. The overjet
measurement is 4mm measured at the left central incisor.
Moderate crowding is present in both arches. A constricted
maxillary arch form relative to the lower arch is present
resulting in buccal cusp to buccal cusp relationships extending
from the second molars to the first bicuspids on both
sides, a bilateral posterior crossbite tendency (Fig. 2). The
skeletal relationships are mildly Class II. The mandible is
posterior divergent and the lower anterior face height is
larger than average. The maxilla shows posterior vertical
maxillary excess (Fig. 3). However, the patient does have adequate
lip competence at rest.
Treatment Sequence
Passive self-ligating brackets with standard anterior
Damon torque prescription were placed. Quarter-inch, 2 oz.
posterior cross elastics were used as needed from the lingual
of the upper molars to the labial of the lower molars from the
first archwire insertion of .014 copper NiTi. The archwire
sequence of 14x25 CuNiTi, 18x25 CuNiTi, 19x25 stainless
steel (SS) was followed with 10-week appointment intervals.
The posterior crossbite relationships were corrected prior to
advancement to 18x25 CuNiTi. Once both arches were
worked to 19x25 SS, a RMO fixed/removable trans-palatal
arch was inserted into the vertical lingual sheaths of the upper
molars with 6mm of clearance relative to the palate. A collimated CBCT view of the maxilla was captured with iCAT.
A mini-screw placement simulation was performed in
Anatomage software showing excellent bone density at the
mid-palatal suture (Fig. 4). A 6mm TOMAS orthodontic
mini-implant was inserted at the mid-palatal raphe at the
mesial aspects of the first molars. A dumb-bell attachment
was bent from 19x25 SS and bonded into the cross-slot of the
TOMAS mini-screw with filled flowable composite (Wave,
Patterson Dental). Lingual buttons were bonded to the second
bicuspids and the second molars. Elastic chain force was
applied from the dumb-bell attachment to the maxillary second
bicuspids, and second molars in addition to the mesial
extension of the RMO TPA just mesial to the first molars
every four weeks for six months (Fig. 5). Upon bite closure,
19x25 TMA wires were inserted, the TPA was removed and
standard techniques were used for detailing and finishing.
Treatment Objectives
- Non-surgical correction the posterior crossbite relationships
with arch development and early and light
cross elastics
- Maximize display of posterior teeth in the buccal
corridors
- Avoid extrusion of anterior teeth during open bite
correction
- Avoid increasing gingival display
- Intrude en masse the posterior dentition with a single
TOMAS mid-palatal orthodontic mini-screw
- Finish the posterior dentition mildly out of occlusion
to account for potential relapse
- Achieve ideal occlusal relationships of overbite, overjet,
molar and canine relationships
Treatment Results
En masse intrusion of the maxillary posterior dentition
required six months with anterior open bite closure being
achieved with auto-rotation of the mandible (Fig. 6).
Gingival display upon smiling improved to a pleasing position
relative to the gingival margins of the maxillary anterior
teeth with intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth with leveling
of the arch and crowding resolution (Fig. 7a&b). An overbite
of 2mm and overjet were established as well as canine guidance
and a Class I molar and canine relationship. Display of
maxillary posterior teeth in the buccal corridors was achieved
in addition to a congruent smile arc relative to the contour
of the lower lip. The posterior dentition was finished mildly
out of occlusion to account for relapse potential. Treatment
required 19 months to complete.
Discussion
The use of a single miniscrew is obvious in terms of cost
and chances of failure relative to other techniques that require
at least two miniscrews and as many as four. Miniscrew placement
in the midpalatal suture combined with a bonded
dumbbell attachment allows for simple symmetric application
of power chain forces to each posterior segment. The density of the midpalate in adults is well established.12, 13, 14 Although
placement of miniscrews in the midpalatal suture of adolescent
patients is controversial, it seems that a low dose maxillary
collimated cbct view with an assessment of density is
justified considering the clinical advantages.
Retention of Molar Intrusion
According to a recent publication by Baek et al., molar
intrusion for anterior open bite correction has the potential to
relapse 18 percent, on average, within the first year after treatment,
whereas thereafter it is relatively stable. With this
knowledge, it seems reasonable to consider a retention mechanism
that delivers at least 100gms of intrusive force to the
molars during sleep time during the first year of retention.
The active vertical corrector (Allesee Orthodontic Appliances)
(Fig. 8) has been shown to be successful in achieving molar
intrusion for open bite correction in the mixed dentition by
using repulsive magnetic forces.2,3,4 This appliance delivers
250gms of intrusion force prescribed for 24-hour wear except
when eating. The REPEL* (Fig. 9) is a modification of the
active vertical corrector designed to be worn at nighttime for
the first year after orthodontic mini-screw-assisted molar
intrusion for anterior open bite correction in the permanent
dentition. It delivers 100 gms of intrusive force with repulsive
1/4 x 1/32 inch neodymium magnets** embedded in acrylic over
the first molars in vacuform retainers with acrylic buccal
shields to prevent lateral displacement of the mandible during
the application of intrusion forces.
Conclusions
This case demonstrates the following: Passive self-ligation
and early light elastics can be effective for posterior crossbite
correction and to aid in maxillary arch development. The use
of a dumb-bell attachment allows for simple application of
power chain for intrusion of posterior teeth from one palatal
TOMAS orthodontic mini-screw. The mid-palate can be a
reliable insertion site for orthodontic mini-screws especially
when assessed with CBCT insertion simulation. The REPEL
appliance is an intriguing idea to prevent relapse of molar
intrusion during the first year of retention.
* Not commercially available.
** K&Jmagnetics.com
References
- Baek, et. al.: Long -term stability of anterior open bite treatment by intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth. AJODO , October 2010
- Dellinger EL A clinical assessment of the Active Vertical Corrector—a nonsurgical alternative for skeletal open bite treatment. AJODO, May 1986 (5): pp 428-36.
- Raymond E. Barbre and Peter M. Sinclair A cephalometric evaluation of anterior openbite correction with the magnetic active vertical corrector. The Angle Orthodontist: June 1991, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 93-102.
- Dellinger EL Active vertical corrector treatment—long-term follow-up of anterior open bite treated by the intrusion of posterior teeth. AJODO, August 1996 (110), Issue 2: pp 145-154,
- Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW. Tongue-thrust therapy and anterior dental openbite. Am J Orthod 1972;62:287-95.
- Creekmore TD. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1983;17:266-9.
- Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H. Skeletal anchorage system for open bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:166-74.
- Park HS, Kwon TG. Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2004;74:703-10.
- Shapiro PA, Kokich VG. Uses of implants in orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1988;32:539-50.
- Sherwood KH, Burch JG, Thompson WJ. Closing anterior open bites by intruding molars with titanium miniplate anchorage.
- Park YC, Lee SY, Kim DH, Lee SH. Intrusion of posterior teeth using mini-screw implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
- Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):723-9. Critical aspects in the use of orthodontic palatal implants. Cousley R; Orthodontic Department, Peterborough NHS Hospitals Trust, Peterborough
District Hospital, Thorpe Road, Peterborough PE3 6DA, Cambridgeshire, UK. Richard.Cousley@pbh-tr.nhs.uk.
- Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):137-44. Palatal bone density in adult subjects: implications for mini-implant placement. Moon SH, Park SH, Lim WH, Chun YS. Source Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry,
Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
- Int J Oral Sci. 2010 Jun;2(2):98-104. Applied anatomic site study of palatal anchorage implants using cone beam computed tomography. Lai RF, Zou H, Kong WD, Lin W. Source Clinic of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. tlrf@jnu.edu.cn
|